The US Supreme Court refused to reopen the lawsuit filed by the music company geniusblaming alphabetcontroller Google, stealing millions of lyrics. The judges upheld a ruling dismissing the lawsuit, which accused Google of violating its contract with Genius by using the lyrics of its songs in search results without proper attribution.

This is Google’s latest victory in the Supreme Court, having previously won the battle for the liability of its video streaming service. YouTubeto host terrorist videos.

There are deep disagreements about how copyright laws apply to online speech and content aggregation. The lower court said that Genius does not own the copyright to the lyrics as they belong to the composers and publishers.

Genius claimed that Google violated its contract by copying the lyrics and promoting them in Google search results without attribution. Genius, which claims to have incurred millions in damages due to the situation, originally sued Google in 2019. To get attention and prove their point, Genius used a secret code that spelled out the phrase “caught in the act” to show that Google was stealing your texts.

“We appreciate the court’s decision, agreeing with the Attorney General and several lower courts that Genius’ claims are unfounded.“Google spokesman Jose Castaneda said on Monday.We license lyrics on third-party Google search and do not crawl or copy websites in search of lyrics.“.

The terms of service used on most sites are generally supported by state law. Genius and its supporters have argued that this solution could effectively weaken the contractual protections that sites enjoy when users agree to their terms.

Google defended itself against the allegations

Google claimed that Genius was trying to present a “quasi-copyright” claim masquerading as contract law. Federal law takes precedence over lawsuits involving similar copyright issues, even if they do not directly focus on claims of copyright infringement. This difference was fatal for Genius.

The genius stated that the decision of the lower court “threatens to harm any of the thousands of companies that benefit by adding user-generated information or other content.“.

Elizabeth Prelogar, US Attorney General and top Supreme Court counsel in the Biden administration, urged judges to dismiss the case, arguing that it is an “inadequate vehicle” for resolving conflicts between copyright law and contract rights.

Mundo Conectado Deal Center: Selection of Discounts and Lowest Prices
Best deals on electronics, cell phones, TVs, soundbars, drones and more

Source: Reuters.

…..