In the world of technology, evolution is constant. The new vehicles sold in the commercial market with improved migliori and pre-functionality preview process. But, not synonymous with “new” and “migliore”. This is the confrontation between the Void Phone (2) and its predecessor Phone (1). Despite the expectations, the device was just presented not represented in a premade pass of the previous model. Mom?

USB Gen 2 and earlier transfer rate

Using Il Nothing Phone (2) USB Gen 2 technology For the previous transfer At first glance, you can make an indietro rispetto that can fully meet all your expectations. In fact, USB Gen 2 is a free transfer speed was lower before Ripetto alle versioni più latest. This requires more time to download and download files compared to other devices with more advanced USB technologies.

IMX 890 sensor Nothing Phone (2)

Another thing that casts doubt on the Nothing Phone (2) is the use of the sensor. IMX 890. While this sensor is only used by BBK brands, other smartphone manufacturers such as Xiaomi, POCO, Google, Asus, Samsung do not use it in their devices. duty may suggest that its sensor IMX 890 can do anything. in terms of image quality.

Snapdragon processor

Il Nothing Phone (2) uses a sub-hardware variant with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor. 3.0Ghz clock speed. The 0.08Ghz speed alone has increased to Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2. Additionally, it faced both processors in the Geekbench test, Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 used in Poco F5 gets a score equal to Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 used in Phone (2). In practice, both chips are practically identical in performance, and this does not make the Phone (2) superior to its predecessor.

As a result, despite the expectations, the smartphone Failure to provide a leading model. The choice to use a less advanced USB technology, an uncommon image sensor use, and the adoption of a sottoalimentato processor are all things that call into question the performance of the Nothing Phone (2).

font | This picture