Gives you output based on what you write, say or demand. productive artificial intelligence suddenly came into our lives. We were immediately fascinated by what we saw and quickly got used to it. Now, even in Webtekno, we produce the images of some content entirely with artificial intelligence, we don’t even need to say that.

This is where the real danger begins. While tools such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are so limited that they are not used for malicious purposes, there are also artificial intelligences that follow the same technological paths and are developed precisely for malicious purposes. Think about it this way: only 2 years ago mobile applications that made pictures of people naked were on the agenda, now even a passport photo of the person they want to see naked is enough for a malicious person. This is, of course, the company’s social problem. And when it comes to guns and bad intentions in wars, the waters get very muddy.

Of course, the concerns are not limited to this one. For example, while Boston Dynamics robots are produced without weapons, there are those who buy and build their own weapon systems on them, or even produce armed robots from scratch:

Will these robots start killing them in the near future if someone says “Kill that person”?

Artificial intelligence doesn’t need a robot body to do these things… Will it have consequences as bad as nuclear wars or epidemics, or even threaten the very existence of humanity?

Despite these possibilities, we always sprinkled our hearts with water and said, “There are soooooooo many more!” we said. However, we see that a software that learns on its own using what we have produced so far can surprise us all with its not very human answers for now. Kill an unethical robot if you can does not execute the command Who can guarantee?

If the atomic bomb that fell on Hiroshima were dropped today, we would no longer need an airplane, a pilot to fly that plane, and most importantly, a person to push the button that drops that bomb. An unethical artificial intelligence is enough for all of them!

Of course, we don’t know the answer to these questions. But if it doesn’t make sense to you that we don’t know, let’s just say this: not even the father of artificial intelligence knows the answer to these questions…

You may have seen Yoshua Bengio for the first time. However, he is the father of systems that we today call “productive artificial intelligence”, which can scan and learn the texts and images produced until today and try to give you original answers. Bengio’s work in the 1990s and early 2000s, ChatGPT And half way through the trip form the basis of such tools.

Sure, there are dozens of scientists and engineers just as influential and successful as Bengio, but his views also shed light on the future of artificial intelligence.

“We don’t know how to guarantee the safety of humanity!”

Referring to the potential issues that may be encountered with the development of artificial intelligence in his blog post on his personal website, Bengio; brings the problem to safety at some point:

“We don’t yet know how to make an AI tool controllable and thus guarantee the safety of humanity! Yet we – including myself – are on our way to building such systems.”

“It’s painful to face the idea that we may have contributed to something that could have been hugely devastating.”

Addressing the dangers and psychology of this situation that anyone developing and currently using artificial intelligence systems would not want to be aware of, Yoshuo said: “Those kinds of thoughts are hard to digest. It’s hard because accepting the logical conclusions that follow these thoughts; it means questioning our own role, the value of our work, our own sense of worth.” says and adds:

“Most of us would like to see ourselves as having a fundamentally good and virtuous purpose, contributing to something useful for the community or society of which we are members. A positive image makes us feel good about our work and gives us motivation and energy to continue. It is painful to face the idea that we may have contributed to something that could have been hugely devastating.”

“Human nature will lead us to seek solace in more comforting arguments rather than face all the horrors of such possibilities. Discussing the benefits of AI is not enough to make up for the fact that AI has the same dire consequences or even existential risks as nuclear war and epidemics.”