from DALL-E Although it required a bit more professionalism when it first appeared, the developments and different applications that have been made since then have made it possible for anyone who can connect to the internet to produce images. However, as a result of this, 3-5 visuals and his biography artist The number of writers also skyrocketed.

Of course, we are not saying anything bad to our artists here. On the contrary, if you follow our social media channels, you can meet many artists. artificial intelligence We propose joint projects with tools. Here it is necessary to evaluate how he uses the artificial intelligence tool while making the artist distinction. From the US Federal Courts A judge ruled in a review that the image obtained by artificial intelligence cannot be copyrighted.

“Humanity is an essential part of any valid copyright.”

Based on the case brought to court by Stephen Thaler There’s the image you see above. He regularly applied to the US Copyright Office to obtain the copyright of the image he produced. If approved, Thaler would appear as the creator and owner of the image. But time after time refused.

rejected last year Thaler, arguing that this was illegal and arbitrary, eventually tried to sue the Copyright Office. But Federal Court Judge Beryl Howell ruled that copyright free from human hands He said it was not given to any work and that it was the cornerstone of copyright law.

Afterward, the judge said he was aware that the artists were using artificial intelligence in their works, not as a complete tool, and going forward, “How much of a work must be human-made to be copyrightable?” He said it would raise questions like:

Thaler eventually shared that he disagreed with the judge. What would your answer be to this question? Do you think Thaler was right in his judgment?