Developer of ChatGPT, one of the most popular artificial intelligence tools OpenAIhas recently been on the agenda with more lawsuits. In particular, US authors claim that GPT, the artificial intelligence language model that brings ChatGPT to life, through their own content They claim to be trained. If that’s the case, the lawsuits will never end.

In July, authors Sarah Silverman, Christopher Golden, and Richard Kadrey filed a lawsuit against OpenAI. we had switched. Now about this one more time a similar development happened. This time, Michael Chabon, David Henry Hwang, Rachel Louise Snyder, and Ayelet Waldman complained about OpenAI. Authors are responsible for the use of their own content in the GPT training.used without permission and illegally‘ they claim. According to the authors, OpenAI has made a profit through all this.

They demand compensation from OpenAI

The authors have some very clear requirements for OpenAI. The first of these, as you can guess, a compensation. The plaintiffs are seeking damages from OpenAI for copyright infringement. But there’s more. In the petition, the court states that OpenAI “illegal and unfair trade practicesIf the court makes a decision in this direction, things will become complicated. Because brand new legal obligations arise for OpenAI.

Although the developments mainly put OpenAI on the agenda, the authors generally refer to all companies that develop language models for artificial intelligence. they are disturbed It has to be said. In fact, in July, more than 10,000 writers took part in a campaign involving OpenAI, as well as other companies such as Meta and Google. open letter They published it. This open letter stated that all companies working on the language model must obtain permission from the authors. Details in the letter include the author’s obligations to authorize use of his works, to receive payment, and to provide references.