The US government has been focusing on developments in artificial intelligence technologies for some time. Government officials are not against the development of artificial intelligence, but they are checked They argue that this should be done in such a way that ordinary individuals should be protected from risks. Technology giants too in a similar opinion. In fact, the US government and the CEOs of companies like Google, Microsoft and OpenAI have met in recent weeks and reached an agreement. we had switched.

Now we will tell you about a new meeting in the USA. CEO of Tesla and SpaceX Elon MuskA meeting was held with the participation of names like Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and Google CEO Sundar Pichai. meeting in New York, was kept closed to the public The CEOs did speak with members of the press before and after the meeting. The statements made show that the parties are on the same page. Let’s take a closer look at what is being talked about on the forum.

What exactly was the purpose of the forum?

A group of lawmakers in the US continues to work on a bill aimed at artificial intelligence. Increasingly inclusive This bill aims to both develop artificial intelligence technologies and protect people from the risks of artificial intelligence. This is the purpose of the forum in general: It was about how it should be. Members of Parliament and leading figures from the technology world gave their views on what the legal framework would look like.

Who said what?

Let’s start with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg:

*Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg, who were on the agenda a few weeks ago on the cage fighting issue, were seated far apart.

According to meta boss Mark Zuckerberg, there are two things that need to be defined for artificial intelligence. These subjects access with security. In this context; Zuckerberg stated that the best bill that can be drafted should include everyone, arguing that academics, industry stakeholders, politicians and non-governmental organizations should come together. Zuckerberg, law balanced He also underlined that this should be the case.

Mark Zuckerberg is the discussion partner who will protect people against the risks of artificial intelligence government He also said it was so. However, according to Zuckerberg, lawmakers are currently not eligible to draft a law. Because Zuckerberg said that people must first interact with artificial intelligence-oriented technologies and understand the benefits that developing technologies can bring. must be understood defended.

Tesla and X CEO Elon Musk wants a ‘referee’

According to CNBC, Elon Musk made a small statement at the end of the forum. In this statement “It was a very civil discussion with some of the smartest people in the world.Musk did not go into details. However, that is not necessary because we have known the billionaire businessman’s views on artificial intelligence for a long time. resembles a double-edged sword Musk states that legal regulation is very important.

According to Elon Musk, there will be a company that will drive the artificial intelligence industry. right very important. The businessman states that companies will work according to this referee and says that the decisions to be made will allow the development of technologies that are truly beneficial to humanity. Musk, what was discussed in the forum will go down in history he claimed.

OpenAI’s Sam Altman is as enthusiastic as ever

Sam Altman, the boss of OpenAI, developer of popular artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT, has always been on the side of regulations. was enthusiastic. This situation continued during the last meeting. The OpenAI CEO said he was confident the government was trying to do the right thing and that the attempt to take quick action did not sway him. it influences told.

Other stakeholders also share a similar view

Not just Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk and Sam Altman; CEOs of companies like Google, Microsoft, IBM and NVIDIA usually are too the same views they have. Everyone is aware of artificial intelligence technologies under certain frameworks states that this needs to be developed. The main question here is what the arrangement in question will look like. The discussions that the parties will have together will lead to the formulation of the law.

US government position

MPs attending the “AI Insight Forum” event discussed artificial intelligence technologies enough that they are not experts They are aware of this and therefore indicate that they will not be hasty in making rules. Delegates stated that similar events will be expanded, and not just in the US Many countries want a common law on artificial intelligencethey emphasize that it is precisely their goal to achieve this.