ChatGPT And halfway through the journey We constantly use these types of models and create different content for you. These tools, which are available to everyone around the world, have been continually tried to limit them since the day they were first released. Here we saw for the first time that countries try to draw certain boundaries.

China, England and the United States of America (USA) were the countries that wanted to take the biggest step in this regard and still support these steps. But this artificial intelligence – in the sense that varies from country to country – trustworthy for laws guaranteeing use of the EU We should not forget that he has been working for a long time. Because they themselves Artificial Intelligence Act He took his biggest step.

After 38 hours of negotiations, an agreement was reached.

The conversations, which focused on models like ChatGPT on Thursday, gave way to systems like facial recognition the next day, and officials discussed that as well.

The most fundamental basis of the law in question is to make the development of artificial intelligence safe. This law, of which we will see the first steps in 2021, ChatGPT As momentum gained, it started to appear more on our agenda. These laws will impose stricter regulations the riskier the AI ​​model/tool ​​in question. Which also determines the difference between artificial intelligence systems and simple software clear criteria will be mentioned.

Updates for both military and law enforcement sides:

On the military side, artificial intelligence-enabled tools will undermine the security competencies of Member States or the organizations responsible for them. will have no effect. Law enforcement forces will also be able to benefit from artificial intelligence. In this context, if consent is obtained, biometric remote identification systems can be used in public areas.

Risk classifications are also available.

On the other hand, although the artificial intelligence device in question is not classified in the risk group, it is used to keep the user aware. The content is created with artificial intelligence will indicate clearly.

The use of certain artificial intelligence tools identified as high risk will be permitted. However, these vehicles will have to meet the required requirements to enter the EU market. Naturally ensuring data securitycomes first.

But for some there is also a stigma of unacceptable. This means that vehicles in this risk group are not located within the EU. will be banned resources. In this context, cognitive manipulation, obtaining facial information from the Internet or images from closed camera systems, recognition of emotional signals in the workplace and in educational institutions, social scoring and biometric classification to extract sensitive data such as sexual orientation or religious beliefs will be prohibited.

The situation for commonly used artificial intelligence tools is as follows:

The base models that power these instruments must provide a certain level of transparency before they reach the market. on its own site EU; very complex, huge and powerful models can pose a risk states. Therefore, transparency will be essential to some extent.

Naturally, a separate office must be opened to monitor these.

For this reason, an artificial intelligence agency was created to monitor the most advanced artificial intelligence models. independent experts This agency, which will benefit from consultancy, will both see security risks and share its ideas for improvement.

Naturally, this will be located above the office. the management team will also have a say in the implementation of regulations. An event in which leading names from the industry can participate advice forum It will always remain under the eyes of management.

The European Parliament will vote on the Artificial Intelligence Act early next year.

However, we will not see any regulations put into practice before 2025.

So what will be the punishment if this law is not followed?

There are several scenarios if the law is broken. If any prohibited practices occur, the company will 7 percent of annual income or 35 million eurosIf the criteria are not met, there are fines of 3 percent of annual income or 15 million euros, and if false information is spread, there are fines of 1.5 percent of annual income or 7.5 million euros . In the parts where we say “or”, we look at which is higher.

What is your opinion on this law?