He Republican Party state Colorado asked US Supreme Court overturn the unprecedented decision of the state Supreme Court that removed the former president from office Donald Trump belonging 2024 elections In this state.

The Colorado Republican Party was also involved in the case and is fighting to maintain its right to include Trump in the March primary, although Trump has not yet filed an appeal.but it is expected to be soon, the network reported cnn.

The appeal means the stay of the state court’s decision, which was set to expire on January 4, will last forever until the US Supreme Court announces whether it will accept the appeal, and if so, until it makes a final decision on the matter.

It also embroils nine federal judges in yet another dispute involving the GOP presidential front-runner. The High Court is separately involved in other cases related to Trump’s election subversion criminal case.

The Colorado judge presiding over the trial granted the state Republican Party’s request to intervene in the case shortly after the lawsuit was filed. In its presentation on Wednesday, the party asked the US Supreme Court to hear the case and will return Trump’s name to Colorado primary.

You might be interested > Michigan Supreme Court rejects Trump’s 2024 election disqualification

“By removing President Trump from the ballot, the Colorado Supreme Court has committed unprecedented disregard for party law First Amendment politicians elect candidates of their choice and usurp the people’s rights to choose elected officials,” the party’s lawyers condemned.

In addition to the First Amendment argument, the Colorado Republican Party said the state Supreme Court incorrectly expanded the “rebel ban”» The Constitution applies to presidents even though that position is not explicitly mentioned in the provision, and they argue that only Congress, not the courts or state election officials, can enforce the ban.

“Rejecting a long history of precedent, the State Supreme Court has now concluded that individual plaintiffs, state courts, and the Secretaries of State in all 50 states plus the District of Columbia have jurisdiction enforce section three of the fourteenth amendment“said the state participant.

The Colorado Supreme Court previously rejected all of these arguments. The trial judge agreed with the Colorado Republican Party’s contention that the ban does not apply to presidentsbut the Colorado Supreme Court disagreed and overturned that part of its decision, blocking Trump until the election.

The party also suggests that other states accept Colorado’s reasoning remove Trump from the ballot as similar problems are expected in Maine And Oregonand some Democratic officials have called on election officials to consider removing Trump without a court order.

You might be interested > Trump resumes anti-immigrant speech as Blinken visits Mexico to discuss immigration crisis: Esquivel | video

“Given the number of challenges to President Trump’s candidacy currently pending in other states, ranging from lawsuits to administrative proceedings, there is real risk borrow the flawed and unprecedented analysis of the majority of the Colorado Supreme Court and repeat the resulting serious legal error,” they added.

The request came a few hours after The Michigan Supreme Court rejected a similar lawsuit 14th Amendment, keeping Trump in the state. The results of the duel further improve Colorado’s chances of appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court, which is uniquely positioned to provide national guidance on the novel. constitutional question.

(Europe Press)