He European Parliament ratified the law this Wednesday artificial intelligence (AI) that the European institutions agreed in December, the first thing that regulates this technologies in the world and thereby took an important step towards its final approval in European Union.

“Europe “This is now a global benchmark in artificial intelligence,” the European Commissioner for the Internal Market said after the vote. Thierry Breton, who assured that “we regulate as little as possible, but as much as necessary.”

“A pioneering framework for innovative artificial intelligence in Europe with clear limitations,” he noted during his participation in social network President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyenwho added that it would “benefit from Europe’s fantastic talent pool” and “lay the foundation for robust AI around the world.”

Thus, with 523 votes in favor, 46 against and 49 abstentions, the European Parliament approved the agreement, which was closed at the end of last year by a group of representatives of the three Community institutions and which still required the approval of the plenary session of the European Parliament. European Parliament.

The EU is expected to give final approval in the coming weeks, although it will not come into force until 2026.

Citizen protection

The rules allow or prohibit the use of this technology depending on risk what does this mean for citizens, and with this the EU intends to set an example for the rest of the world and stimulate European industry against USA and China.

Breton made it clear that throughout their development they “resisted special interests and pressure groups that asked for large AI models to be excluded from regulation.”

In general terms, the AI ​​law prohibits mass surveillance in public places, but allows law enforcement agencies to use biometric identification cameras with prior court approval to prevent an immediate terrorist threat.

You might be interested > They include a young man in the process who altered photographs of IPN students using AI.

Also to locate or identify the person who committed the crimes terrorism, human trafficking, sexual exploitation or, for example, environmental crimeas well as to search for victims of these crimes.

Likewise, the regulation sets out a number of obligations for generative artificial intelligence systems, which underpin programs such as ChatGPT, companies OpenAI, or bard, from Google.

In particular, they will have to indicate whether text, A song or one Photo were created using artificial intelligence and ensure that the data used to train the systems is copyright compliant.

In addition, a number of high-risk artificial intelligence systems have been identified that can only be sold if their developers guarantee respect for fundamental rights.

For example, those that can influence the outcome of elections or those used by financial institutions to assess the solvency and credit rating of customers.

Breton said the law would be “a launching pad for EU startups to lead the global race for trustworthy AI.”

“This will enable European citizens and companies to use AI ‘made in Europe’ safely and confidently,” he said.

The standard also provides for the creation European Bureau of Artificial Intelligencewhich will coordinate the use of technology by national authorities and will be consulted by a group of scientists and civil society organizations.

You might be interested > Using artificial intelligence, they imitate the voices of religious authorities to deceive the nuns.

First step

Deputy General Director European Consumer Organization (BEUC), Ursula Pahl, The statement said consumers would be protected from some degrading practices such as social rankings and would be able to join class action claims for damages if they had been harmed, but warned that the legislation “had to go further” and that relevant regulators authorities must have the necessary resources.

The left-wing group in the European Parliament also expressed criticism of the law, especially for the fact that instead of prioritizing the protection of citizens, it was proposed to “make exceptions for reasons of national security and extend the red carpet for big technology companies.”

European employers BusinessEurope, considered that the interpretation of the law in practice would be critical to investment decisions, and emphasized that it would be necessary to “support companies that innovate and are not limited by bureaucratic procedures because they can afford it.”

A coalition of European cultural creators’ associations called the law a first step and called for the development of “responsible and sustainable” AI to ensure that rules are applied in a “meaningful and effective way.”

(EFE)