The recent adoption of the AI ​​Act by Unione Europea marks a pivotal moment for the future of artificial intelligence. This story will not only bring the attention of Europe’s global center to its own normative initiation process, but will also resolve a debate about the future. new rule Impact of innovations and security of the AI ​​Campus. Questo apprcio regolamentare dell’Unione Europea was first reflected An optimistic and cautious vision of the advancement of technologybalancing and securing innovations.

L’Europa scrive la storia: le nuove regole dell’intelligence Artificiale dell’AI Act

March 13, 2024, together with the European Union, provides unforgettable data for the artificial intelligence set Officially passed the AI ​​Act. Questa legge, the first of its kind globally, has received broad approval from the European Parliament. 523 votes for a favor, 46 opposition and 49 tension. With this move, Europe becomes a pioneer in Dell’s definition of a standard for responsible AI governance, potentially influencing similar policies in other parts of the world.

Thierry Breton, The European Union’s internal trade commission proves that Europe is not stable quality test spherical for AI regulation. Having a technologically green vision means criticism is no manchino. There is nothing you can do other than the AI ​​Act to reduce all the risks and risks associated with Artificial Intelligence, there are no other remedies Limiting Innovative Technology.

Leggi anche: Regulation on the entry into force of the Digital Markets Act in Europe

A notable aspect of the AI ​​Act is its approach to classifying risks, Separating AI applications into the second category of danger represents. Regole comes with new automatic machines and sorveglianza tools with serious sono reserve and high risk. Hello same tempo, usi ritenuti inaccessibleVery good, combined with a social valuation system similar to social credits.

Despite noble intentions, the Artificial Intelligence Act has raised concerns among technology companies. Innovation and the End of New Norms as Innovation Brakes Creating competitive technologies in Europe rispetto agli omologhi in the USA and China. However, an attempt has been made to allay fears by introducing more flexible rules for underlying models, particularly ChatGPT, a core technology for products such as OpenAI.

I’m kidding too

• approach basato sul riskchio: Classifying and regulating the system of artificial intelligence on the basis of potential risk to society, minimum risk and unacceptable riskwith stricter regulations by category and high risk;
• artificial intelligence system and alto risk: IA and high-risk IA applications, critical infrastructures, new applications, applications in other sectors, comply with due diligencerisk mitigation system, setting high-quality data, recording data, documenting detailed data, and operating soundly, accurately and safely;
• banned apps: Compile the manipulative practices and social networks that are part of a system and administration and azie that IA personally considers a key threat (come to China);
• risky special: A system that produces artificial intelligence, such as a chatbot, providing interactions with the machine, sharing deepfakes or other artificial intelligence-generated content ticket in conclusion;
• sanctions for non-compliance: Violations can cause huge amounts of damage, from 7.5 million euros or 1.5% of annual turnover to 35 million euros or 7% of global turnover. Biometric identification and surveillance? The regulation treats biometric identification systems, especially those used for real-time facial recognition in public spaces, as part of law enforcement, ad alto risk, in alcuni casi, ne vieta l’uso. However, according to critics of the scenario, the prevention of terrorist attacks will be achieved in the near future and person-comparative research will have very strict requirements.

When will the Artificial Intelligence Law come into force?

AI Law is expected to come into force May 2024. This rapid timeline underlines the urgency facing the EU with technological evolution and the need for adequate regulation. The data differ with a different rispetto during the European Parliament’s announcement on this issue.