When artificial intelligence visual imaging tools first came out, they worked in a very amateurish way. However, as large-scale datasets were fed into these tools, results increased rapidly. First from OpenAI DALL-Eof Stability AI stable diffusion And halfway through the journey tools stood out.

However, these tools often cause unauthorized processing of data of people or institutions. went to court. Adobe has distinguished itself since the launch of this trio. firefly introduced. Because Firefly was trained with Adobe’s stock photo library, it didn’t cause any licensing issues and it was possible to use the results for commercial purposes. But Adobe, which said it did not use its competitors’ artificial intelligence to train its own model, was not telling the truth.

Adobe, which criticizes artificial intelligence models that feed off each other, also used artificial intelligence outputs in Firefly training.

Users can upload millions of images to Adobe’s stock photo platform. According to Bloomberg, Adobe representative Michelle Haarhoff said that images are produced by generative artificial intelligence The dataset used in Firefly training confirmed that it was a small portion. This corresponds to approximately 5 percent of the data set.

So are the images in the 5 percent in question Midjourney and DALL-E Made by competitors such as. But each of these images; They were examined in detail to see if they contained a brand, character or logo.

In such a situation you expect criticism to come from outside, but it has been present within the company from the start. Whether the artificial intelligence model is ethical or not There were disagreements about it. Because these conversations are confidential, the names of the sources are not mentioned. However, criticizing competitors’ data collection methods when they know deep down that this is the case puts the company in a controversial position. What do you think?