May 12, 2025
Trending News

Starting today, jurors will deliberate on Trump’s case after making their final arguments.

  • May 29, 2024
  • 0

defense and prosecutors in the case against Donald Trump for illegal payments to porn actress Stormy Daniels they came to the conclusion this Tuesday his last argumentsafter an

defense and prosecutors in the case against Donald Trump for illegal payments to porn actress Stormy Daniels they came to the conclusion this Tuesday his last argumentsafter an 11-hour day and the case will be in the hands of a jury today, Wednesday.

According to the procedure, Judge Juan Merchan will read the instructions to the twelve jury members. details of what they can and cannot do while the discussion lasts, and after that He will send them to a closed-door meeting.

The last to speak was the prosecutor’s office, which in the afternoon emphasized that Donald Trump is stymied by irrefutable evidence that he falsified documents to silence a porn star. and defend his 2016 presidential race.

Stormy Daniels. | Photo: Reuters.

Attorney Joshua Steinglass, in his last attempt to impress the jury before they decide whether Trump is “guilty” or “not guilty”: portrayed Trump at the center of this criminal trialthe first former president in US history.

Steinglass commented:

In fact, Michael Cohen – Trump’s former lawyer and the right-hand man who paid Daniels – was more of a “finder” for the accused than his lawyer (…) A guy with “shoes in the mud” who could harass people and threaten them with lawsuits.

The criminal charges against Trump stem from Cohen’s payment of legal fees to porn star Stormy Daniels.

The payment was made days before the 2016 elections. And if the story of the 2006 betrayal had come to light, prosecutors say it could have cost Trump the election.

Cohen testified from the stand at that trial that as soon as Trump sat down in the Oval Office of the White House, he returned the money.

“In fact, the defendant did not pay the lawyer, but the porn star, passing the money through the lawyer.”Steinglass said.

Joshua Steinglass during Trump’s trial. | Photo: Reuters.

The defense, for its part, came up with its latest twist Monday morning. described Cohen as a compulsive liar whose only goal is to destroy Trump. Steinglass, in turn, tried to refute this theory, pointing out that Trump’s former right-hand man never said that his former boss had a relationship with Daniels, and that if his true goal was to harm the politician, he would have made a different statement .

Mountain of “irrefutable evidence”

Steinglass did a chronological overview of the testimony of 22 witnesses and 300 pieces of evidence presented in the criminal trial and did a detailed review of pre-election calls, texts and emails regarding Daniels payments among members of Trump’s leadership team.

He even simulated a conversation, using his hand as a telephone, between Cohen, Trump and his bodyguard.

“Irrefutable Evidence”According to Steinglass, they notes by Allen Weisselbergthe Trump Organization’s then-chief financial officer, about how Cohen would be paid for the money he spent to buy Daniels’ silence.

“The law is the law, and it applies equally to everyone. There is no particular standard for this defendant,” Steinglass recalled at the end of his arguments.

Yawning and boredom

The judge decided to extend the day four hours longer than usual to try to complete the defense and prosecution’s final arguments on the same day.

Although Steinglass was always energetic, yawns could be heard and seen after eleven-hour arguments in a Manhattan criminal courtroom.

Trump, for his part, went to his social network: Social truthto show – and in capital letters – the general reluctance to announce one’s irritation during a break:

BORED!

Despite the general fatigue, Judge Merchan noted that extending the day would be a good idea because The jury seemed attentive and attentive to the prosecutors’ arguments..

Today, The jury will receive instructions from Judge Merchan and must reach a unanimous verdict, which could take several days. and, if consensus is not reached, the judge will be forced to declare a mistrial.

EFE

Source: Aristegui Noticias

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *