Adobe’s new terms of service, updated last February, received a great response. Adobehad stated that it could access users’ content “through both automated and manual methods” and use “techniques such as machine learning” to develop its generative AI tool called “Firefly”.

Now Adobe has published a new version of its terms of service, explaining that its artificial intelligence features will not train users with content stored on the device or in the cloud. Moreover, users can analyze the content possibility to withdraw consent gave.

Artists still don’t trust Adobe

Adobe Chief Strategy Officer Scott Belsky says what you mean by machine learning PhotoshoppingHe explained that these are non-productive AI tools, such as “Content Aware Fill”. While Adobe maintains that the updated terms do not give the company ownership of the content and will never use users’ work to train Firefly, artists’ trust has already been broken.

Of course, concerns about the unauthorized use and commercialization of copyrighted works of prolific authoritarian intelligence models are not new. Early last year, artist Karla Ortiz filed a lawsuit against Midjourney, DeviantArt and Stability AI after her works were used under her name in several generative artificial intelligence models. ‘battle’ between artists and artificial intelligence tools continues to grow on legal grounds.