The GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX 4060 Ti are two of the most important graphics cards that currently populate the mid-range. The emphatic “Ti” suggests that the latter is stronger than the former, and is therefore placed within what we may regard as “premium” middle classwhich is evident in both performance and selling price.

Both they use the same architecturea detail that is very important because it means that we will not find differences in the support of advanced technologies between them and that, regardless of the model we choose, we will enjoy the same high-end technologies, among which the Frame Generation stands out. .

This was exactly one of the most important differences that we had to consider when comparing the GeForce RTX 4060 versus the GeForce RTX 3060, because in that case the former has an advantage thanks to the Ada Lovelace architecture, which brings important advances and supports Frame Generation, a technology that Not supported on GeForce RTX 3060.

The truth is that both have a lot in common, and this means that doubts arise when choosing between the two models which is better in the price-performance ratioa question that I want to help you solve today with this article, where we are going to thoroughly compare both graphics cards to help you make the right decision.

I will also consider GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB, a special version that NVIDIA launched in response to some complaints that 8 GB was not enough for a graphics card of this type. Speaking of which, we’re looking at a dedicated 1080p graphics card, and at that level 8GB is sufficient, although we’ll talk about the graphics memory issue later as well, as this topic is too mythologized.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs RTX 4060 Ti

As I said before, two use the architecture of Ada Lovelace They don’t use the same GPU. The graphics core has a GeForce RTX 4060 AD107which is the smallest and simplest of all NVIDIA’s current generation GPUs, while the Ti uses a graphics core AD106the solution that best corresponds to what we can consider the middle ground.

The use of different GPUs already allows us to guess that it exists noticeable difference between the two graphics cards, and there’s no better way to check than to take a close look at the specs and features of both models. This will also give us the very important context that we need to continue to delve deeper into this comparison.

GeForce RTX 4060 specifications

• Graphics core AD107 in 5nm.
• 18.9 billion transistors.
• Encapsulated area: 146 mm2.
• Graphics Processing Clusters (GPC): 3.
• Texture Processing Clusters (TPC): 12.
• 3072 shaders at 1830MHz-2460MHz.
• 96 texturing units.
• 48 raster units.
• 96 tensor cores of the fourth generation.
• 24 cores of the third generation RT.
• 128-bit memory bus.
• 8 GB GDDR6 at 17 GHz with a bandwidth of 272 GB/s.
• 15.11 TFLOPs of performance in FP32.
• 35 TFLOPs in ray tracing.
• 242 TFLOPs in FP8 (IA).
• 24 MB L2 cache (453 GB/s effective).
• TGP 115 watts, average consumption 110 watts.
• It uses the PCIe Gen4 x8 standard.
• You need an additional 8-pin power connector.
• Price from 299 euros.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti specifications

• Graphics core AD106 in 5nm.
• 22.9 billion transistors.
• Graphics Processing Clusters (GPC): 3.
• Texture Processing Clusters (TPC): 17.
• 4352 shaders at 2310MHz-2535MHz, normal and turbo mode.
• 136 texturing units.
• 136 tensor kernels of the fourth generation.
• 48 raster units.
• 32 cores of the third generation RT.
• 128-bit bus.
• 8 GB GDDR6 at 18 GHz (288 GB/s bandwidth).
• 22.06 TFLOPs of performance in FP32.
• 51 TFLOPs in ray tracing.
• 353 TFLOPs in FP8 (IA).
• 32 MB L2 cache (effective 554 GB/s).
• It uses the PCIe Gen4 x8 standard.
• 160W TGP.
• Price from 411 euros.

As we expected, using a different GPU makes the specs of the two graphics cards very different both in terms of specs and raw performance in rasterization, ray tracing and AI. Model Ti clearly wins, as expected, from it exceeds its performance in FP32 by 6.95 TFLOPsand it’s also much more powerful ray tracing and AI.

GPU AD107

If we talk about consumption, both are placed at a very good level because they have very low consumption and this gives them a high level of efficiency. GeForce RTX 4060 It has the advantage of consuming only 115 watts, which makes it a very affordable variant that we can easily mount even on less powerful powerful PCs. The Ti model consumes 55 watts more, but it is also very reasonable and can easily be moved with a 500 watt source.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 1,280 more shaders, it also has more texturing and rasterization units, contains more RT cores and tensor cores, has more L2 cache and also achieves higher bandwidth in said cache and graphics memory. Both models have 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

AD106 GPU

There is a version of the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti that has 16GB of graphics memory, but the price difference from the 8GB model is significant and it already enters the field where too much pedaling on the GeForce RTX 4070which makes it not worthwhile and it is better to invest a little more in the direct purchase of the top model, i.e. the GeForce RTX 4070.

It’s very easy to understand, the GeForce RTX 4070 performs on average in all the most used resolutions (1080p, 1440p and 2160p) 35% more than the 16GB GeForce RTX 4060 Tiand can be purchased for 579 euros, that is, it costs 119 euros more than the cheapest 16 GB GeForce RTX 4060 Ti.

There is a price difference 25.87%but the performance improvement we get with the GeForce RTX 4070 is a 35%, which means it offers much more interesting value, and as I told you earlier, it’s a better buy than the 16GB model, which in very specific cases barely improves performance compared to the 8GB model.

Coming back to the comparison between GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX 4060 Ti, both have shaders by Ada Lovelace3rd generation RT cores, 4th generation Tensor cores and use a next generation optical flow accelerator, which means they are compatible with next generation technologies that They are not supported in Ampere:

• Changing the shader execution order, which is done at the shader level and changes the thread order of shader workers in real-time, making threads dispatch faster and solving classic divergent execution problems.
• TDisplaced Micro-Mesh and Opacity Micro-Mask technology, which improve ray tracing performance using microtriangular meshes and accurate determination of coverage and density of graphics elements.
• NVIDIA DLSS frame generation, which generates one additional frame entirely by AI for every two frames rendered traditionally. Combined with DLSS Super Resolution, it can multiply the frame rate per second by five.
• FP8/INT8 operations, thanks to the new fourth generation tensor cores, which inherits the AI ​​working capabilities we have already seen in NVIDIA’s Hopper architecture, used in graphics accelerators for servers and data centers.

Comparison of performance, consumption and price

Raw numbers are very important, but performance is even more important. Both graphics cards are specialized for 1080p resolution because of the design they use in the memory subsystem (128-bit bus). They can also offer good performance at 1440p, but as we’ll see later at this resolution, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti performs better thanks to more L2 cache and because it has more bandwidth.

As expected, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is much more powerful than the GeForce RTX 4060. On average, we have a difference of one 24.17% higher performance in favor of the former at 1080p resolution, 27.37% at 1440p and 21.60% at 1080p with active ray tracing. I know what you’re thinking, and what does that mean in games? To explain this well, we need to look at the second chart.

We can play with both models in optimal conditions at 1080p, as the GeForce RTX 4060 recorded an average of 90 FPS at 1080p. However, at 1440p it fails to maintain a stable 60 FPS in all cases and remains average 57 frames per secondwhile the Ti model achieves 73 frames per second. That’s why what I told you before that the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is better prepared to move 1440p games.

With ray tracing enabled, the Ti model also demonstrates its greater performance by being able to maintain an average of 65 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4060 remains at 54 FPS.

Now let’s move on to consumption. The GeForce RTX 4060 requires much less power and is more efficient has 24.17% lower performance at 1080p but consumes 36% less. Its consumption is so low that we can use it without a problem with a 400W source, even if it is a basic model, as long as it meets the minimum quality.

Now let’s look at the performance per euro invested, or what is the same, the images generated per euro spent. Priced at €299.99, the GeForce RTX 4060 has a ratio of 0.3 frames per euro and the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is 0.26 frames per euro, meaning that the first has a slightly higher performance-price ratio.

The same happens at 1440p and with ray tracing at 1080p, the GeForce RTX 4060 is a slightly better value in terms of price per frame, but keep in mind that the difference is so small that by the time we can buy one GeForce RTX 4060 You For less than 400 euros, things would change completely. A few weeks ago it was available for 379 euros and for that price it was the best on the market.

Final Notes: Which Model Should You Choose?

If your goal is to play at 1080p, there’s no doubt that at current prices, the GeForce RTX 4060 It’s a more balanced option and generally more affordable. With it, you can play everything at this resolution with maximum or very high qualities with good fluidity, and in very specific cases of very demanding games, you can use DLSS 3 to improve the frame rate.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is best choice if you will play in 1440p resolution, and it’s worth it if you can buy it for 400 euros or less. This would be the optimal price point to maximize the cost of the frame value, so keep that in mind and keep an eye out for potential offers as there is always movement in these ranges. You already know that at MuyComputer we usually share these types of deals whenever possible.

As for the 16 GB model, I think my opinion has already been expressed, it is too expensive for what it offers and not worth it because it is against the GeForce RTX 4070. If you can afford to pay 450 euros for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Don’t buy the 16 GB, save a little more and buy the GeForce RTX 4070, which has an average of 35% more performance and offers a much better experience.

Note that even though the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12GB of graphics memory, it is much more powerful, has a 192-bit bus, uses much faster graphics memory, and has much more L2 cache, so it performs much better at 1440p and is capable of offering good 4K as well enjoyment. This graphics card it plays in a different league and the 16GB GeForce RTX 4060 Ti cannot compare with her. That’s why it pays to invest 70 euros more and go for the GeForce RTX 4070.

Note: This selection contains some links from our affiliates, but none of the products included have been designed or recommended by them or their manufacturers, but have been selected based on our own criteria.