What better way to honor one of America’s greatest female judges than to create artificial intelligence to answer legal and judicial questions in a tone similar to that of the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a United States lawyer, lawyer, and judge who worked for 27 years in her country’s Supreme Court, gaining renowned recognition throughout her career as a champion of feminist ideals and gender equality.

Although he died in 2020, leaving the North American country in mourning for a few days, he has just become a title again, as technology company AI21 Labs has developed artificial intelligence based on the answers he uses to legislative and criminal matters.

Its purpose will be to initially advise people who have problems in the legal field, through the chat already available, although so far only in English, although it can be accessed from anywhere in the world.

To ask questions you need to go to the website https://ask-rbg.ai/#ask, where a text field will appear in which you have to type the question, then the AI ​​will answer “yes”. “No” or “maybe” with little justification in this regard, based on the more than 600,000 words in the US legal spectrum with which this system was programmed. It is noteworthy that all comments were made by Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg in interviews, opinions and suggestions.

However, like all the latest innovations in the field of artificial intelligence, this one has not gone unnoticed and, on the contrary, has already been questioned because of its functioning and the place where people will be the judges of the future, where these types of technologies reach a high level of development.

For the time being, according to Emily Bender, a professor at the University of Washington, This technology can give answers like a real judge, but does not think soBecause “it can translate words and their style will be based on the text they enter, but that’s not reasoning.”

Interestingly, the justice system in the United States is already implementing various technologies to help calculate the likelihood of a recurrence of recurrences of accused people or the recovery of large lost databases, the latter using Blockchain and Machine Learning.

Similarly, this Ginsburg-inspired artificial intelligence is already being used in some proceedings in the country’s courts, law and criminal institutions.

On the other hand, questions also arose about the impartiality of this system. For example, David Martinez, a professor at the Open University of Catalonia (UOC), argues that if the algorithm is limited to executing only programmed commands, there is no possibility that the mechanical application of the rules will be replaced by factors such as superstition. And personal belief. , Because if so, this type of intellect has no elements of subjectivity.

In this sense, artificial intelligence can be a tool for “unlocking” processes in which judges can be affected by the emotions of the moment, although they are not free from error.

An example of the above is Spain, where the “Spanish Artificial Intelligence Oversight Agency” was set up to try to assess the behavior of this type of technology and help clarify ethical dilemmas regarding its use in society.

In this regard, Luis Villares, a magistrate from a European country, suggests that “the algorithm can not detect the reasons why human behavior occurs, which is due to the lack of ability to understand emotions and also plays a negative role in making timely judgments.

Finally, the Spanish magistrate, Antonio del Moral, also points out that “AI returns working hours to magistrates and managers who may engage in other tasks, such as more thorough evaluation of evidence. However, AI. Cannot replace judges. Justice, by definition, is human and “Imperfect, as we assume. Judicial reasoning can not be placed in standardized forms, because each citizen deserves a personal decision.”

Continue reading: