In recent years Huaweiis central to many allegations of the United States. In the trade wars, the US and then President Donald from Trump Huawei, the first company he went to, was accused of espionage.

Examine the institution’s work US officialsnoticed some patterns in the company’s movements. According to CNN’s report, Huawei is placing equipment in signal towers and base stations, especially around US military bases in rural areas. It was even argued that the agreements they made were not profitable.

The review focuses on the financial perspective

According to this newly announced review The United States GovernmentThere is a reason for the intense effort to replace Huawei’s equipment with a program called “remove and replace”. The aim of this program is to completely remove Huawei technology from the country.

According to incoming news, the review was specifically aimed at influencing military communications. Huawei focused on equipment. It was argued that among these military sources of communication, the US Strategic Command also took place. The Strategic Command is also known for controlling the country’s nuclear weapons. CNN also states that Huawei is selling low-cost equipment to local operators in regions such as Colorado, Nebraska, Oregon and Montana, raising suspicion. Because operating in these regions has no financial advantage for Huawei. Because many of these projects are conducted in areas near US military bases, the FBI explained that they believe Huawei is spying on military communications and may even attempt to infiltrate networks. However, no concrete evidence regarding the allegations has yet been released.

Former senior FBI agent speaking on the subject John Lenkart, He said the assessment is financial, not technical, and that Huawei’s agreements make no sense in terms of return on investment. Sources who spoke to CNN said that even if information is stolen with these channels, it is very difficult to trace and prove.

Huawei, on the other hand, denied the allegations and FCC only announced that it was operating in the commercial spectrum determined by the Ministry of Defense and that they could not access the spectrum reserved for the Ministry of Defense.