OnlyFans, one of the biggest discussion topics today, came up with a very striking claim today. OnlyFans has attempted to outperform its competitors in the adult content industry in multiple lawsuits filed in the United States. He was accused of bribing Meta employees.

According to the allegations, OnlyFans added adult content stars who are not its own users to its “terrorist” list via Meta. Due to this action reportedly done in 2018, some stars using OnlyFans competition platforms said their Instagram accounts ‘contains terrorist content’ He saw his entire business and income drop.

They are highlighted on all social media platforms, not just Instagram:

• Kelly Pierce, one of the names that would have been added to the terror list

However, users weren’t just flagged as such on Instagram or Facebook. In exchange for the alleged bribery, Meta employees have been informed that these accounts contain terrorist content. Founded in partnership with Microsoft, Twitter, Google and YouTube He also presented at the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism.

Accounts of the stars with the addition of this information to the common platform not just on Instagram, it was flagged on all other platforms. With the flag, the content in the account was subject to shadow ban without the user’s knowledge so that it would be shown to almost no user.

It was alleged that there was at least one senior executive among the employees who received bribes:

In some cases, there were also allegations about how the bribery in question took place. According to one of these allegations, the bribe was claimed by Fenix ​​International, the parent company of OnlyFans. through a secret subsidiary in Hong Kong Opened by Meta employees to offshore bank accounts was broadcast. Among those who took bribes was “at least” one senior manager.

Statement from OnlyFans, the Global Internet Forum for Meta and Counter-Terrorism:

In response to the BBC’s allegations in question, the three companies used the following statements:

• Fans only: “We know that these lawsuits have been filed. We are not aware of any evidence to support these claims. The alleged participants have publicly stated that these cases are without merit.”
• Meta: “These allegations are unfounded and we will consider them in the context of lawsuits if necessary.”
• Global Internet Forum on Counter Terrorism (GIFCT): “Our ongoing work to improve transparency and oversight of the GIFCT hashshare database is the result of extensive interaction with our stakeholders and will not affect these claims.”