It’s been more than two months since the terms of the lawsuit between Twitter and Elon Musk were set over Elon’s decision to scuttle a buyout operation that began months earlier. And although it seems his legal team is still working to try and delay the date of celebrating the samefor now, the countdown continues until October 17, as the first of five days during which views will expand. Two weeks that are probably not pleasant at all for Elon Musk.

And it is while we wait to see how the trial unfolds at this point everything seems to indicate that Twitter’s current board has the upper hand. The trend in Delaware, where the trial is held, along with the judge’s record to date, generally favoring parties seeking compliance with what was signed, as opposed to those wishing to withdraw from said operations, suggests that if the Legal Team Elon Musk is able to document the reasons given by the billionaire, he has a lot to lose.

So under these circumstances, and while it’s well known that Elon Musk isn’t too inclined to tone down his speech, even if it’s for his own good, maybe i should make an exception. But it doesn’t seem to be working, and worse (worse for his interests, I guess it’s actually something harmless for mere mortals), he seems to be continuing to fight what he sees as Twitter’s big problem. boots, they were perilously approaching the point where the inventive gentleman ended his days with regard to the mills.

Elon Musk posted a few hours ago poll on Twitter, about a hypothetical peace plan between Russia and Ukraine. The offer, which is summarized in four points, which I copy and translate from Musk’s own tweet to avoid misunderstanding:

«– Repeat the elections in the annexed regions under UN supervision. Russia will leave if it is the will of the people.

– Crimea is formally part of Russia, as it has been since 1783 (until Khrushchev’s mistake).

– The supply of water to Crimea is ensured.

– Ukraine remains neutral.»

I am not going to enter, as it is not the raison d’être of this report, to judge this hypothesis of the proposal, but I must say that I fully understand, both in the official question and in the following, most participants chose NO to their ideas, this means that the conditions proposed by Musk for a possible pacification will not be acceptable to them. And of course I also understand that Elon Musk wasn’t too amused to see that most Twitter users disagreed with him.

The problem, the point where we find the real problem is that when we are faced with a comment from a user who says «I wonder how many bots were activated to overturn the original result“, Musk replies “Actually. Biggest bot attack I’ve ever seen«. They face an opinion that generally contradicts their criteria, which many may see as a kick in the pants from Ukraine, Europe and NATO, instead of assuming that their opinion is a minority (notice I’m not saying wrong, only minority) , Instead of accepting it instead of accepting it, he prefers to think that his eternal Twitter nemesis, bots, are behind it.

And this, in addition to being another example of Elon Musk’s megalomaniac character, may weaken his position in the process. Added to the inability to demonstrate a massive robot presence that argues for its retreat, with publications like this gives the feeling that you see robots where there are users who do not meet your criteria, that you see giants where there are only windmills. And in such a mediation process, in which all parties are under constant surveillance, this does not appear to be the most reasonable way to proceed in the face of one’s own interests.