Chatbot developed by OpenAI ChatGPThas become the most discussed topic in the internet world in recent months. The AI ​​tool can quickly answer anything you ask, write articles and even poems. We’ve even recently seen it prevent someone from getting a parking ticket.

The fact that the artificial intelligence tool is so impressive naturally crosses everyone’s mind”Will everything people write now be written by artificial intelligence?” brought up the question and showed that a revolution could be coming in many issues from broadcasting to social media. Of course, the world’s largest Internet encyclopedia on Wikipedia The question was whether such a thing would happen. The founder of the site, who posed this question to the Evening Standard Jimmy Wales replied.

According to Wales, ChatGPT isn’t quite ready to write a Wikipedia article just yet

Wales, one of Wikipedia’s founders, spoke about what this giant encyclopedia might look like in the future, saying he’s thinking a lot about whether the content should be written by artificial intelligence. The 56-year-old entrepreneur is one of the models people in the Wikipedia community already see. not good enough He indicated that he is cautious at the moment for the reasons, but they are also curious about the possibilities that may arise.

As an extension of Wales, ChatGPTs for this not done yetHe also stated that he could not predict when it would be ready. “I’m still thinking ‘ChatGPT, please write a Wikipedia entry on the Empire State Building’ We are far from saying However, I don’t know how far we are from that.” The entrepreneur said, and then added that much better developments have been made in the past two years than he thought.

A major problem is that the model can provide incorrect information.

Wales also stated that there are still many problems with ChatGPT: “One of the problems with the current ChatGPT is what they call “hallucination.” I call it lying. get something out of the blue It tends to. This is very bad for Wikipedia. We have to be very careful with this.”

Artificial intelligence tools give wrong information It was already a hotly debated topic. Many times before, people have provided evidence that models like ChatGPT sometimes fail to provide accurate information. For example, according to the Evening Standard, a University of Queensland economist told ChatGPT a month ago “What is the most cited economics article of all time?” he asked a question.

The chatbot, on the other hand, found an answer to this question within seconds, and the “‘A Theory of Economic History’ by Dougless North and Robert Thomas, published in The Journal of Economic History in 1969 said that. While this answer appears to be true, it was when the article was later examined such an article turned out not to be. The authors and magazine were real; but no such article has ever been written. This is sometimes the model false answers proved he could.

ChatGPT Saved a Dog’s Life: Vet Undetectable Illness Detected by GPT-4

In addition, Wales also falls within ChatGPT itself. your contradictions added that. Entrepreneur turns to artificial intelligence tool »Has the Empire State ever been hit by a plane? asked the question. The model, on the other hand, replied that at first nothing like that happened, but then an airplane crashed. This showed another problem of the technology.

How can AI models be integrated into Wikipedia in the near future?

While all of this poses a problem for Wikipedia, Wales believes artificial intelligence could be used for the site. some benefits He also says it is possible. An example is the ability to use this technology to check whether two Wikipedias conflict with each other. For example, it is stated that people do not have to read both articles and this can be done automatically.

Finally artificial intelligence prejudiced There are also concerns that it could happen. In other words, an AI-powered Wikipedia could make the platform even more biased, which has already been criticized for being biased (for reasons that the majority of editors are white).

These statements show that AI-generated content will not make it to Wikipedia for some time due to the flaws of the models. However, if the development of technology continues at this rate and the problems can be eliminated, such a possibility could be real.