nitrokeyA security company discovered that some smartphone models equipped with Snapdragon processors were not authorized by Qualcomm, the maker of smartphone chips, by unauthorized means. a revenge case Applying for user consent In non-crittografata forms, the importance of easy intercettati and the possibility of reaching consensus.

A rude vice from Qualcomm called “mudo mudo”: Snapdragon processor is subject to data attacks to gain the consent of all security forces

Gli esperti hanno notato che and their processor Qualcomm assemble the settings of the prosthesis Android mechanisms, exploiting Google’s proprietary services and providing data. This behavior is abnormal and stable smartphone Sony Xperia XA2 is equipped with open source /e/ OS. During the test, the traffic generated by the device was monitored via the software. Wire Shark, a utility used to analyze network traffic. Gli Experti hanno notato subito una ad requests android.clients.google.com, although there are no apps available on Google. After that, the device asked the /e/ OS developers to send a connection request. An institution to check the della connection of the google server.

After extensive research I discovered that the domain name is izatcloud.net. It is owned by Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. before sono stati inviati tramite il protocollo HTTP non- Of courseCould be an all’intercettazione vulnerability. In addition, experts discovered that Qualcomm collects a fairly large amount of information: the unique identifier of the device, the name and serial number of the chipset, the version of the XTRA software, the country code and mobile operator, the type and version of the operating system, the make and model of the device, the operation of the processor and modem. time, List of installed applications and IP address. In addition, the company pinpoints the exact location of users, which could constitute a serious breach of privacy.

Gli Experti Raccomandano Agli Utenti Experti of Technology Blocking the Qualcomm XTRA service or redirect traffic. Qualcomm’s secondary service provider, followed by:

For application software, aggregate data collection power, univoci identifier (a serial number of the chipset or an international ID), data for device power-up and operation, configuration data from make, model and wireless operator, system system operating system and version, software and prezioni of the device with chipset prezioni, battery and thermal usage.

You can use personal fonts more often, such as data broker, social networks, other partners, or general fonts.

However, blocking the Qualcomm XTRA service ensures that access to all mobile devices is not necessary, meaning that the cost of an exhibit that often remains a risky adventure for a beat is huge. Qualcomm ha già risposto all’incidente, sostenendo che Data protection is legal and does not conflict with the privacy of the policy. However, users may be concerned about the amount of data collected without their consent, which may raise questions about Qualcomm’s privacy practices and safeguards that must be implemented to ensure users’ safety.

Risk of Personal Data Consensus on Use of Personal Data and Information Required for Basic Information Potential non-automatic endcome marketing invasive, la prophylaxis not equipment, surveillance and breach of privacy. In addition, it does not provide adequate sound protection, potentially incompatible with criminal computing or other malicious people. This is a used protocol and non-critical (HTTP) method. We will learn more about the problem of Snapdragon processors at Qualcomm in the future and we will be obliged to send them to third parties.