Deputy Nilov was outraged by the Duma’s decision to protect private photo recording cameras
January 25, 2024
0
The State Duma rejected the bill developed by the LDPR, which proposed restricting the operation of complexes for automatic registration of violations, except those owned by the state.
The State Duma rejected the bill developed by the LDPR, which proposed restricting the operation of complexes for automatic registration of violations, except those owned by the state. There are now cameras on roads used under concession agreements or rented from private owners. However, representatives of the Liberal Democrats continue to insist that this state of affairs is unacceptable.
“Private owners of cameras use various methods to ‘increase profitability’ – for example, they install them in areas where motorists slightly exceed the speed limit due to improper traffic management, or violations are recorded in violation of procedures,” the head of the State Duma said. Labor Committee told the AvtoVzglyad portal, social policy and veterans affairs Yaroslav Nilov. “All this leads to erroneous fines, which are easier for drivers to pay than to appeal. We believe that complexes should only belong to state or municipal structures; private owners should not be involved in this. The enormous mockery of motorists must end…
At the same time, speaking to a correspondent of the AvtoVzglyad portal, Mr. Nilov said that work on the bill will continue and the document will be finalized. According to him, the necessary restrictions should be included in the law ‘On highways and road activities’.
In the meantime, let us remind you that the group of traffic cameras in the country currently numbers about 30,000 devices. And the vast majority of them are owned by private owners. It is therefore clear that the parliamentary lobby in the Duma and other centers of power is categorically opposed to the essentially “popular initiative” of the LDPR: businessmen are not willing to lose billions of rubles…
“Private owners of cameras use various methods to ‘increase profitability’ – for example, they install them in areas where motorists slightly exceed the speed limit due to improper traffic management, or violations are recorded in violation of procedures,” the head of the State Duma said. Labor Committee told the AvtoVzglyad portal, social policy and veterans affairs Yaroslav Nilov. “All this leads to erroneous fines, which are easier for drivers to pay than to appeal. We believe that complexes should only belong to state or municipal structures; private owners may not be involved in this. The enormous mockery of motorists must end…
At the same time, speaking to a correspondent of the AvtoVzglyad portal, Mr. Nilov said that work on the bill will continue and the document will be finalized. According to him, the necessary restrictions should be included in the law ‘On highways and road activities’.
In the meantime, let us remind you that the group of traffic cameras in the country currently numbers about 30,000 devices. And the vast majority of them are owned by private owners. It is therefore clear that the chamber lobby in the Duma and other power corridors is categorically opposed to the essentially “popular initiative” of the LDPR: businessmen are not willing to lose billions of rubles…
Donald Salinas is an experienced automobile journalist and writer for Div Bracket. He brings his readers the latest news and developments from the world of automobiles, offering a unique and knowledgeable perspective on the latest trends and innovations in the automotive industry.