And a green crocodile: Mosparking continues to mock drivers
- August 8, 2022
- 0
The second year has begun, as a journalist from the AvtoVzglyad portal is trying to challenge the “cost” of the fine at Moscow Parking. The first court is
The second year has begun, as a journalist from the AvtoVzglyad portal is trying to challenge the “cost” of the fine at Moscow Parking. The first court is lost, the second ahead. But, unfortunately, the officials of the department traditionally did not wait for the second instance decision, but decided to strike the administration for non-payment of the fine.
This story started in June last year, when your correspondent was fined for not paying for street parking. Milashenkov. The reason for non-payment, of course, was not the desire not to pay, but banal forgetfulness. It was the fifth stop on the route, a crazy day, in general – it can happen to anyone. This is what Moscow Parking uses, in the mobile application whose postpay system is cleverly arranged – you can extend the start time afterwards, but you cannot change the parking start time. In short, everything is for the convenience of the citizen!
The most annoying thing is that the parking lot, where payment was not made, was located in the zone, which costs 40 rubles per hour. And the delay in payment was 6-10 minutes. That is, the damage inflicted on Mosparking in the amount of less than 10 rubles, which makes a fine of 5,000 rubles seem like a complete injustice. So lawyer Mikhail Nikitin promised to challenge the validity of the charges. However, the Ostankinsky Court did not comply with the complaint and refused to consider the issue of the reduction of the fine, after which the case was appealed to the Moscow Court, where it still has the status of “pending” . by the judge”. What “Moscow Parking” was reported in advance and in a timely manner by the defendant, but… something went wrong.
– From the point of view of law and common sense – the body that receives a complaint must not only transmit it to the competent court together with all the documents of the case, but also indicate in its information system that the decision has not entered legal force and is appeal lodged with the court, – lawyer Mikhail Nikitin explains the situation on the AvtoVzglyad portal, adding that upon appeal to the court, the term for paying a fine is not calculated until the decision of the Moscow court is made (provided that a complaint is filed in time against the negative decision of the court):
– The reality is that contrary to common sense, MADI answers something like this: yes, you filed a complaint through us, but we don’t know if the court has considered it or not. And for some inexplicable reason, it puts the burden of proof of these facts on the motorist, which we see in another case in this example. A complaint to the court, but Mosparking is already preparing to file an administrative violation and receive a double fine. Meanwhile, the employees of this structure themselves have to monitor the progress of the case, since there is a possibility – you just need to check the case file on the website of the Moscow City Court, but why bother? Judging by the last answer (I have it at my disposal), GKU “AMPP” started to stick to the same cruel approach. This gives the driver a choice. Or pay a fine early while the decision can be reversed, and then you have to scratch money from the treasury. Either keep an eye on your mailbox and the FSSP database for the subsequent filing of objections to officials’ irresistible desire to establish an illegal protocol on the fact of “non-payment” of the fine, or fight over the To induce MADI or AMPP to withdraw the fine from the bailiff’s production…
It is worth noting that such a practice with the appointment of “administrative offices” before a court decision is permanent and systematic for these departments. However, this problem has not been solved for years, and why refuse for the sake of it, if the amount of the car owner’s debt doubles. Besides, where is this money going? Isn’t it with these funds that Mosparking has now pulled a crocodile from the Moscow Zoo for compensation?
Recall that the hated green tow trucks in Moscow are called crocodiles. Is this “joke” really appropriate at a difficult time for the country? Especially when you consider that many active people – journalists, politicians, bloggers and public figures – are raising money little by little not to mock car owners, but to use drones to carry out real combat missions of our army?
Photo avtovzglyad.ru
Photo avtovzglyad.ru
This story started in June last year, when your correspondent was fined for not paying for street parking. Milashenkov. The reason for non-payment, of course, was not the desire not to pay, but banal forgetfulness. It was the fifth stop on the route, a crazy day, in general – it can happen to anyone. This is what Moscow Parking uses, in the mobile application whose postpay system is cleverly arranged – you can extend the start time afterwards, but you cannot change the parking start time. In short, everything is for the convenience of the citizen!
The most annoying thing is that the parking lot, where payment was not made, was located in the zone, which costs 40 rubles per hour. And the delay in payment was 6-10 minutes. That is, the damage inflicted on Mosparking in the amount of less than 10 rubles, which makes a fine of 5,000 rubles seem like a complete injustice. So lawyer Mikhail Nikitin promised to challenge the validity of the charges. However, the Ostankinsky Court did not comply with the complaint and refused to consider the issue of the reduction of the fine, after which the case was appealed to the Moscow Court, where it still has the status of “pending” . by the judge”. What “Moscow Parking” was reported in advance and in a timely manner by the defendant, but… something went wrong.
– From the point of view of law and common sense – the body that receives a complaint must not only transmit it to the competent court together with all the documents of the case, but also indicate in its information system that the decision has not entered legal force and is appeal lodged with the court, – lawyer Mikhail Nikitin explains the situation on the AvtoVzglyad portal, adding that upon appeal to the court, the term for paying a fine is not calculated until the decision of the Moscow court is made (provided that a complaint is filed in time against the negative decision of the court):
– The reality is that contrary to common sense, MADI answers something like this: yes, you filed a complaint through us, but we don’t know if the court has considered it or not. And for some inexplicable reason, it puts the burden of proof of these facts on the motorist, which we see in another case in this example. A complaint to the court, but Mosparking is already preparing to file an administrative violation and receive a double fine. Meanwhile, the employees of this structure themselves have to monitor the progress of the case, since there is a possibility – you just need to check the case file on the website of the Moscow City Court, but why bother? Judging by the last answer (I have it at my disposal), GKU “AMPP” started to stick to the same cruel approach. This gives the driver a choice. Or pay a fine early while the decision can be reversed, and then you have to scratch money from the treasury. Either keep an eye on your mailbox and the FSSP database for the subsequent filing of objections to officials’ irresistible desire to establish an illegal protocol on the fact of “non-payment” of the fine, or fight over the To induce MADI or AMPP to withdraw the fine from the bailiff’s production…
It is worth noting that such a practice with the appointment of “administrative offices” before a court decision is permanent and systematic for these departments. However, this problem has not been solved for years, and why refuse for the sake of it, if the amount of the car owner’s debt doubles. Besides, where is this money going? Isn’t it with these funds that Mosparking has now pulled a crocodile from the Moscow Zoo for compensation?
Recall that the hated green tow trucks in Moscow are called crocodiles. Is this “joke” really appropriate at a difficult time for the country? Especially when you consider that many active people – journalists, politicians, bloggers and public figures – are raising money little by little not to mock car owners, but to use drones to carry out real combat missions of our army?
Source: Avto Vzglyad
I’m Sandra Torres, a passionate journalist and content creator. My specialty lies in covering the latest gadgets, trends and tech news for Div Bracket. With over 5 years of experience as a professional writer, I have built up an impressive portfolio of published works that showcase my expertise in this field.
