9621 Agnes Crossing, Lake Suzanneview, New Mexico Island 84604-9295.
Openly ignoring the law, from year to year, employees of the Moscow Parking, with incomprehensible persistence, send actions in cases of administrative violations to bailiffs without waiting for
If you go to a car chat where a lawsuit with the GKU AMPP is discussed, most published stories of such a confrontation end up very unpleasant for a motorized citizen. From the beginning of his time, “Moscow Parking”, as if to show who is in power here, has spit on the law that forces him to wait for a court decision on an administrative violation, and forwards cases to the Federal Bailiff until the verdict of Themis is received.
And the FSSP obediently goes “under the hood” and sells the hapless guardian for complying with its enforcement procedures, usually debiting the money owed to Mosparking from the offending car owner’s bank account. The correspondent of the AvtoVzglyad portal also fell into the grip of this system. However, he did not reconcile with the arbitrariness of divisions.
“Knowing full well that this practice has been going on for years, we have nevertheless decided to try to counter it with all the means at our disposal,” lawyer Mikhail Nikitin told the AvtoVzglyad portal. “Therefore, when faced with such lawlessness again, we sent a request to the GKU AMPP to repeal the law, a request to the bailiff to suspend the enforcement procedure, which makes sense in this situation, but in reality, for some reason, they never stop. We have also sent a claim statement to the Zyuzinsky District Court asking for the actions of the bailiff and officers of the GKU AMPP to be recognized as illegal and for the department to submit information about the appeal against the decision to the court. The most important thing we ask the court is to oblige Mosparking to make appropriate changes to the internal regulations. In all cases this will put an end to the premature sending of decisions about administrative violations for enforcement and an end to the violations of the law by this organization. And in order for the employees of the GKU AMPP to be more motivated to comply with the standards of the law, we also submitted an application to the Savelovskaya Interdistrict Public Prosecutor’s Office of Moscow with a request to start a case about the fact of arbitrariness…
Few numbers. In addition to dozens of electronic pages of text, which were sent to various departments and authorities, nearly a thousand rubles, 54 sheets of paper, six postal inventory forms, three envelopes and three checks were spent on sending a lawsuit in triplicate. Some departments need answers within two to three weeks or a month; how long the court will last is not predicted at all. For example, we are fighting for a simplification of the system for challenging fines and reducing the unnecessary burden on government and the judiciary.
I really want this story to finally be noticed not only by the readers of our publication, but also by the State Duma of the Russian Federation and members of our government. The horror of this story is not that, as a result of attempting to appeal a single fine, a particular driver has caused himself a lot of headaches. It’s that this is a systemic problem that hundreds, if not thousands, of car owners face every day, year after year, and can be solved literally with a snap of the finger, if desired. You only need to oblige one particular city department to act strictly within the law.
If you go to a car chat where a lawsuit with the GKU AMPP is discussed, most published stories of such a confrontation end up very unpleasant for a motorized citizen. From the beginning of his time, “Moscow Parking”, as if to show who is in power here, has spit on the law that forces him to wait for a court decision on an administrative violation, and forwards cases to the Federal Bailiff until the verdict of Themis is received.
And the FSSP obediently goes “under the hood” and sells the hapless guardian for complying with its enforcement procedures, usually debiting the money owed to Mosparking from the offending car owner’s bank account. The correspondent of the AvtoVzglyad portal also fell into the grip of this system. However, he did not reconcile with the arbitrariness of divisions.
“Knowing full well that this practice has been going on for years, we have nevertheless decided to try to counter it with all the means at our disposal,” lawyer Mikhail Nikitin told the AvtoVzglyad portal. “Therefore, when faced with such lawlessness again, we sent a request to the GKU AMPP to repeal the law, a request to the bailiff to suspend the enforcement procedure, which makes sense in this situation, but in reality, for some reason, they never stop. We have also sent a claim statement to the Zyuzinsky District Court asking for the actions of the bailiff and officers of the GKU AMPP to be recognized as illegal and for the department to submit information about the appeal against the decision to the court. The most important thing we ask the court is to oblige Mosparking to make appropriate changes to the internal regulations. In all cases this will put an end to the premature sending of decisions about administrative violations for enforcement and an end to the violations of the law by this organization. And in order for the employees of the GKU AMPP to be more motivated to comply with the standards of the law, we also submitted an application to the Savelovskaya Interdistrict Public Prosecutor’s Office of Moscow with a request to start a case about the fact of arbitrariness…
Few numbers. In addition to dozens of electronic pages of text, which were sent to various departments and authorities, nearly a thousand rubles, 54 sheets of paper, six postal inventory forms, three envelopes and three checks were spent on sending a lawsuit in triplicate. Some departments need answers within two to three weeks or a month; how long the court will last is not predicted at all. For example, we are fighting for a simplification of the system for challenging fines and reducing the unnecessary burden on government and the judiciary.
I really want this story to finally be noticed not only by the readers of our publication, but also by the State Duma of the Russian Federation and members of our government. The horror of this story is not that, as a result of attempting to appeal a single fine, a particular driver has caused himself a lot of headaches. It’s that this is a systemic problem that hundreds, if not thousands, of car owners face every day, year after year, and can be solved literally with a snap of the finger, if desired. You only need to oblige one particular city department to act strictly within the law.
Source: Avto Vzglyad
I’m Sandra Torres, a passionate journalist and content creator. My specialty lies in covering the latest gadgets, trends and tech news for Div Bracket. With over 5 years of experience as a professional writer, I have built up an impressive portfolio of published works that showcase my expertise in this field.
:quality(85)//cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/infobae/WGPCMYBJGFGPFHGLEMYSPX22F4.jpg "A prototype Apple-1 computer created by Steve Jobs was sold at auction for almost 0,000.")
