The FTC’s opposition to Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard serves as a source of information for things that, on paper, are not directly related to the case. The firmness of the US regulator, which continues to insist on its intention to take the merger to court, is forcing both companies to squeeze out their best assets, including agreements to expand multi-platform support call of Duty and bring the saga to Nintendo consoles, among other platforms.

Nintendo didn’t miss the opportunity that Microsoft offered to have possibly the most successful video game saga in history in terms of sales volume on its consoles. However, the power of the current Nintendo Switch challenges the presence call of Dutyespecially if we are talking about one-to-one conversions and that they are fully equivalent to the PlayStation and Xbox versions, with the only acceptable changes being graphical cuts for logical reasons.

One of the reasons cited by the FTC is their doubts about the ability of Nintendo consoles to support such a thing call of Duty. Here’s a thread of emails exchanged between Bobby Kotick, still CEO of Activision Blizzard, and Shunturo Furukawa, president of Nintendo, in which the two executives talked about the possible power of what would be a future Big N video game console. . In said thread, you can read Kotick saying the following: “Given the closer alignment with eighth-gen platforms and our previous offerings on PS4 and Xbox One, it’s reasonable to assume we can do something compelling for the next-gen Switch as well..”

“Actually, I think we’ll probably play call of Duty for the new Nintendo console. I can’t tell you that there are concrete plans, but I can tell you that it’s something we would consider. We would consider it when we have the specs, but not at this point. We missed out on this latest generation Switch, but we’ll have to wait for the specs. We have no plans to do so at this time.”

On the one hand, we have Kotick speculating that the power of Nintendo’s future console would be close to the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One, and on the other hand, showing an obvious interest in bringing call of Duty to the Big N platforms, but this is something that is not yet solidified, as Activision Blizzard still needs to know the specifications of the Japanese video game giant’s future console.

In short, Kotick does not close the door to appearance call of Duty on a future Nintendo console. But here it is not only necessary to count that the games will arrive under the brand call of Dutybut also that they are good equivalents of their PlayStation and Xbox versions, because in the case of feature-level trimmed versions (aside from the graphical cuts), many may find them unattractive, which would of course translate into low sales. This likely circumstance will likely be used by the FTC as an argument, as it would mean that Nintendo cannot use it call of Duty compete with your rivals.

All indications are that Nintendo’s future console will retain the profile that brought the Switch to the highest level of sales, so in terms of performance it will be clearly below the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X | S. The hybrid approach means hardware performance isn’t as critical as the inclusion of DLSS, NVIDIA’s upscaling technology, which could help give the anticipated Nintendo Switch 2 a boost to make game conversions with greater guarantees. made for PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X|S.