A United States judge released this Wednesday a court case in which federal prosecutors presented evidence on which they convict the former president. Donald Trump about an illegal attempt to overturn his defeat in the 2020 election when the Capitol was attacked.

The 165-page case is likely the last chance for prosecutors to detail the case against Trump before the Nov. 5 election, given that There will be no trial before Trump faces Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris..

“Working with a team of private conspirators, the defendant acted as a candidate when used numerous criminal means to undermine through fraud and deception“…a function of government by which votes are collected and counted, a function in which defendant, as President, played no official role,” his motion states.

Prosecutors laid out details, including that a White House staffer heard Trump tell family members that it didn’t matter whether he won or lost the election: “We must continue to fight with all our might“.

trump pleaded not guilty to four criminal charges They accuse him of conspiring to stop Congress from certifying the election, defraud the United States and undermine Americans’ voting rights.

Prosecutors working with Special Prosecutor Jack Smith presented their evidence say remaining charges against Trump standdespite a U.S. Supreme Court ruling establishing that former presidents have criminal immunity for official acts committed while president.

You might be interested > US Attorney Pushes for Release of Key Documents Related to Trump’s Attack on the Capitol Case

Prosecutors said that the presentation will discuss new evidenceincluding transcripts of witness interviews and grand jury testimony, but much of that material will not be made public until after trial.

Senior Trump administration officials, including former Vice President Mike Pence and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadowsappeared before a grand jury during the investigation.

Prosecutors filed the lawsuit Thursday, but U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan had to approve the proposed changes before they were made public.

You might be interested > Trump says he won’t run again if he loses in November: ‘That’s it’

Trump’s lawyers They objected to allowing Smith to file a wide range of documents with the court. laying out his evidence, arguing that it would be inappropriate to do so weeks before the election. They argued that the entire case should be thrown out based on the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision.

(according to information from Reuters and EFE)