April 21, 2025
Trending News

The Chinese text editor blocked the author’s access to the novel due to “illegal information”.

  • July 21, 2022
  • 0

Rigid censorship in China is nothing new. Various laws are constantly being passed in the country to restrict access to information that could harm the ruling Communist Party.

The Chinese text editor blocked the author’s access to the novel due to “illegal information”.

Rigid censorship in China is nothing new. Various laws are constantly being passed in the country to restrict access to information that could harm the ruling Communist Party. Yes, recently, after online criticism from the government, all sites have been ordered to check and manually approve every comment left by users.

a lost manuscript

Mitu is reportedly working on a program similar to Google Docs and Microsoft Office 365. Chinese WPS. This brand was launched in 1989 under the wing of the Kingsoft company and has grown largely thanks to government subsidies and contracts, making it overtly dependent on government regulation. Today, the service is used by about 310 million people each month.

The author spoke about his situation on the Lkong literary forum and blamed WPS. He spied on his work and blocked access to the draft when he found “illegal content” in it. Which one is not exactly clear. The author assures that he did not write anything illegal.

Content could be posted on a perfectly clean and literary site, but WPS decided it should be blocked. Who gave the users the right to see their personal documents and arbitrarily decide what to do with them?,
– the author is angry.

WPS developers have released two statements highlighting that their software does not censor locally stored files. At the same time, the company is pretty vague about how WPS works with files hosted in the cloud. According to them, the platform is responsible for the content distributed on its own resources, but the prohibited content control is triggered only if the author creates a link for public access to the document.

Mitu instead states: he only shared the file with his editor once and that was in 2021. From that moment on, he was the only one who edited the text.

There does not appear to be a local copy of the document and has been lost simply because it was stored online.

Source: 24 Tv

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *