The launch of Star Wars Jedi: Survivor was, as we told you at the time, an absolute fiasco. Once again, we found a game that hit the market at a time when its state of development was far from ideal, at least not even adequate, to go on sale. Deciding that you don’t need to do your job well and then get paid for it, developers and publishers have turned pre-purchasing future releases into something of a gamble, only at best you get what you pay for. , no longer.

However, it is also true that The tolerance of some players seems to allow this way of proceeding from developers and distributors. Just take a quick look at the reviews that Star Wars Jedi: Survivor is racking up to see a huge number of them criticizing the horrible optimization, but recommending it anyway. Back in early April, after the disastrous launch of The Last of Us Part 1 for PC, we asked you what you thought of these failed releases, and of course we thought the same. However, a cursory glance at the opinions on Steam will surprise you.

We have also gotten used to that after an unsuccessful start apologies and promises are coming, and it is true that we have already seen cases in the past where redemption was possible. The clearest and closest example is Cyberpunk 2077, but we can also think of other previous cases, such as the (now) fantastic No Man’s Sky. The problem, of course, is the way the confidence of players demanding the minimum ended up falling to all-time lows.

Of course, one of the most common promises is that future updates will fix the issues. However, and especially during the first weeks, they usually do not solve the most serious problems. And such is the case, as we may read in the Wccfts, Star Wars Jedi: Survivor patch 4 doesn’t seem to fix performance issues, at least on consoles. And so it is that when we go through the full notes for this update, we see that the most interesting thing is not what it solves, but what comes next in the list of pending tasks.

Let us recall that the launch of Star Wars Jedi: Survivor it was pushed back from the original date of March 15th to April 28th, in theory to resolve technical issues. Now, a little over a week after release, a small portion of the issues have already been resolved, and we have to believe that a solution to the rest is on the way. So, if it’s your ability to work, why didn’t you decide to delay it for two months or three so that the game arrives in better condition? Of course we don’t know the answer, but we can imagine, can’t we?