9621 Agnes Crossing, Lake Suzanneview, New Mexico Island 84604-9295.
Since the time of Leskovsky’s “Lefty”, the domestic bureaucracy has done its best to avoid responsibility for anything. And that is why it rotted at the base of
Everyone knows the working principle of the working cylinder of the engine. This is a round section “hole in the metal”, along which the piston moves, connected to the crankshaft through the connecting rod. And to reduce the friction between the piston and the cylinder walls, all this economy is lubricated with oil from the crankcase. But it turns out that this friction can be reduced to almost zero and the lubrication system removed, while increasing efficiency. Dmitry Anashin, senior lecturer at the Department of Automation and Robotization of Technological Processes, named RGAU-MSHA after KA Timiryazev, figured out how to achieve this.
Friction in the internal combustion engine cylinder occurs due to the fact that the connecting rod constantly tries to “skew” the piston relative to the cylinder walls. Except the vertically down position. Therefore, to remove friction, it is necessary for the connecting rod to be in this position throughout the entire operating cycle of the engine. Anashin decided that for this it was necessary to make the cylinder not straight, but horseshoe-shaped. And the connecting rod must also repeat this turn. Its force is not transmitted to the crankshaft, but to the eccentric. And you can put in this cylinder not one, but two pistons that move towards each other – like in a 5TDF tank engine.
To save costs for the manufacture of a cylinder-piston group, it makes sense to choose not a round, but a rectangular part of the cylinder and piston. This allows you not to mess with casting, but get by with cheaper stamping. Separately, all these technical solutions were known before, but Anashin brought them together. In addition, the design has already been patented.
Since Timiryazevka, for which patent rights are granted, is still an “agricultural” institution, a prototype engine is being manufactured (at the expense of the inventor, by the way) in a two-stroke version for use in garden tools. But nothing stands in the way of producing both a four-stroke engine of this type and a diesel engine, allowing it to be scaled up for any task.
It would seem: not an engine, but an automaker’s dream. Flat, compact, no oil change required. “Filled” under the bottom of the car and drive on health. But no! According to Dmitry Anashin, breaking into the automotive industry with this kind of technical “revolution” is an idea that, as it turned out, is pointless. Everyone is satisfied with everything. The engineer says that the aviation drone developers expressed interest in his engine, but they cannot afford to invest from scratch in creating the production of the engine.
Even before the start of the NWO, in 2021, Anashin even applied for support from the board of the president of Russia. From there, his letter was sent to the Ministry of Industry and Commerce. The Department of Industry and Commerce kicked off in the US. And from NAMI, the inventor received an answer in the spirit that, they say, well done, but the Russian industry is quite satisfied with those motors that come to us by import. And that’s why no one needs the “Anashin engine” …
Now the situation in Russia is far from being like in 2021. And this gives some hope that the original domestic idea will be realized before some smart Chinese copy it and start supplying our country with “innovative engines” with a stolen design …
Everyone knows the working principle of the working cylinder of the engine. This is a round section “hole in the metal”, along which the piston moves, connected to the crankshaft through the connecting rod. And to reduce the friction between the piston and the cylinder walls, all this economy is lubricated with oil from the crankcase. But it turns out that this friction can be reduced to almost zero and the lubrication system removed, while increasing efficiency. Dmitry Anashin, senior lecturer in the Department of Automation and Robotization of Technological Processes, named RGAU-MSHA after KA Timiryazev, figured out how to achieve this.
Friction in the internal combustion engine cylinder occurs due to the connecting rod constantly trying to “skew” the piston relative to the cylinder walls. Except the vertically down position. Therefore, to remove friction, it is necessary for the connecting rod to be in this position throughout the entire operating cycle of the engine. Anashin decided that for this it was necessary to make the cylinder not straight, but horseshoe-shaped. And the connecting rod must also repeat this turn. Its force is not transmitted to the crankshaft, but to the eccentric. And you can put in this cylinder not one, but two pistons that move towards each other – like in a 5TDF tank engine.
To save costs for the manufacture of a cylinder-piston group, it makes sense to choose not a round, but a rectangular part of the cylinder and piston. This allows you not to mess with casting, but get by with cheaper stamping. Separately, all these technical solutions were known before, but Anashin brought them together. In addition, the design has already been patented.
Since Timiryazevka, for which patent rights are granted, is still an “agricultural” institution, a prototype engine is being manufactured (at the expense of the inventor, by the way) in a two-stroke version for use in garden tools. But nothing stands in the way of producing both a four-stroke engine of this type and a diesel engine, allowing it to be scaled up for any task.
It would seem: not an engine, but an automaker’s dream. Flat, compact, no oil change required. “Filled” under the bottom of the car and drive on health. But no! According to Dmitry Anashin, breaking into the auto industry with this kind of technical “revolution” is an idea that, as it turned out, is pointless. Everyone is satisfied with everything. The engineer says that the aviation drone developers expressed interest in his engine, but they cannot afford to invest from scratch in creating the production of the engine.
Even before the start of the NWO, in 2021, Anashin even applied for support from the board of the president of Russia. From there, his letter was sent to the Ministry of Industry and Commerce. The Department of Industry and Commerce kicked off in the US. And from NAMI, the inventor received an answer in the spirit that, they say, well done, but the Russian industry is quite satisfied with those motors that come to us by import. And that’s why no one needs the “Anashin engine” …
Now the situation in Russia is far from being like in 2021. And this gives some hope that the original domestic idea will be realized before some smart Chinese copy it and start supplying our country with “innovative engines” with a stolen design …
Source: Avto Vzglyad
Donald Salinas is an experienced automobile journalist and writer for Div Bracket. He brings his readers the latest news and developments from the world of automobiles, offering a unique and knowledgeable perspective on the latest trends and innovations in the automotive industry.
