First, the owner of an injured car in an accident should be able to exercise such a right if an appropriate clause is included in their OSAGO agreement. In the absence, no photos and remote reviews for you! As, incidentally, in the event that the driver of the car injured in the accident did not have an OSAGO policy.
But that’s not the point. The catch is that the insurer’s appraiser may “not see” certain damage in the photos provided. And therefore do not include the cost of their liquidation in the final amount of compensation. And then (most likely in court) this “specialist” can always attribute his “blindness” to supposedly low-quality photos of cars sent to accident victims.
In that respect, it can be assumed that after July 15, by hook or by crook, the IC will try to translate the damage assessment after an accident for all cars into a comparable online format. After all, it is a sin not to use this method of “saving”. Even now, they only spend 55% of the money they receive from the sale of OSAGO policies on accident compensation claims. That is, they keep 45% of the money they collected from drivers, at a time when the law limits this share to no more than 23% – as expenses for doing business.
For example, OSAGO insurers are currently making super profits. There is no doubt that with the introduction of remote accident damage assessment, insurers will pay car owners even less and receive even higher incomes.