9621 Agnes Crossing, Lake Suzanneview, New Mexico Island 84604-9295.
Researchers from the most authoritative German organization TÜV SÜD have brought Tesla, the world’s most successful electric vehicle manufacturer, to clean water. They placed the much-hyped Model 3
The results of the latest TÜV SÜD survey turned out to be not very complimentary to the Tesla Model 3. As it turned out unexpectedly, the beauty and pride of Elon Musk’s company took the highest place in Germany in terms of failures among three-year-old companies. oldies. Experts included cars of this model in their assessment for the first time, as only now a sufficient number have passed the periodic technical inspection procedure.
So, from July last year to June this year, 14.7% of “Models-3” needed unplanned repairs, which gave “Treshka” the last 111th place. Before that, Dacia Logan had been a loser for years and now rose to the penultimate position with an indicator of 11.3%.
Today in Russia, for some reasons, it is not customary to scold our Elon Musk. So let’s pretend that the blame for the failure lies squarely with his employees, who directly manage the billionaire’s car business. The poor guys were firmly convinced that the electric car is an ideal form of transportation, a harbinger of future world harmony, and in this confidence they exceeded the limits of reason.
Reasoning that the engine of an electric car does not require oil and filter changes and therefore does not require periodic maintenance, they stopped determining maintenance intervals and developing a network of service centers in 2019. As a result, there are only 186 Tesla technical centers in its home country of the US, while Ford, for example, has almost 3,000.
The hope that their super fantastic product could replace outdated maintenance with remote diagnostics and over-the-air updates turned out to be in vain. Strangely enough, even in the electric car, there were components other than the engine that urgently needed periodic inspection to avoid problems: in particular, headlights, brakes, suspension, etc.
TÜV SÜD expert Mr. Volz notes: “The claim that electric vehicles require less maintenance and repairs is not entirely true. Actually, this mainly applies to the transmission, because no fluids or moving parts need to be replaced. But we didn’t expect the Tesla Model 3 to perform so poorly. This reinforces our belief that electric vehicles also require regular maintenance.”
The angry rebuke from Tesla’s defenders was entirely expected: “This is such a lie it’s not even funny… The expert organization either got paid for its conclusion or it didn’t do the research.” Other commentators, however, answered them quite reasonably: “Presenting your own observations in response to statistical research is so incredibly stupid. I have a friend, he has had a Zhiguli for 30 years, and it also does not break down, he only changes the oil and consumables. And another friend has a new Toyota under warranty for the 3rd time in a year. Does this mean LADA is more reliable than Toyota?”
In fact, few would dispute the axiom that research from a reputable tech organization is still more reliable than the emotions of brand fans. However, those willing to foam at the mouth to defend the advantages of electric vehicles over cars with combustion engines are a dime a dozen, although no one has yet presented irrefutable arguments in favor of ‘green transport’, while its disadvantages are great are. quite clear. And there are two ways we can develop the auto industry.
Either drivers will still be forced to come to terms with the heavily instilled paradigm, or with ‘electric mobility’, along with other post-industrial concepts – such as ‘global warming’, ‘decarbonisation of the economy’, ‘new mobility’, -binary gender identity” – will not withstand the collision with the reality of the emerging new world order.
How the plane that was supposed to fly to the Global Warming Summit in Dubai yesterday could not withstand the collision with reality, but stood firmly frozen on the runway of Munich Airport.
The results of the latest TÜV SÜD survey turned out to be not very complimentary to the Tesla Model 3. As it turned out unexpectedly, the beauty and pride of Elon Musk’s company took the highest place in Germany in terms of failures among three-year-old companies. oldies. Experts included cars of this model in their assessment for the first time, as only now a sufficient number have passed the periodic technical inspection procedure.
So, from July last year to June this year, 14.7% of “Models-3” needed unplanned repairs, which gave “Treshka” the last 111th place. Before that, Dacia Logan had been a loser for years and now rose to the penultimate position with an indicator of 11.3%.
Today in Russia, for some reasons, it is not customary to scold our Elon Musk. So let’s pretend that the blame for the failure lies squarely with his employees, who directly manage the billionaire’s car business. The poor guys were firmly convinced that the electric car is an ideal form of transportation, a harbinger of future world harmony, and in this confidence they exceeded the limits of reason.
Reasoning that the engine of an electric car does not require oil and filter changes and therefore does not require periodic maintenance, they stopped determining maintenance intervals and developing a network of service centers in 2019. As a result, there are only 186 Tesla technical centers in its home country of the US, while Ford, for example, has almost 3,000.
The hope that their super fantastic product could replace outdated maintenance with remote diagnostics and over-the-air updates turned out to be in vain. Strangely enough, even in the electric car, there were components other than the engine that urgently needed periodic inspection to avoid problems: in particular, headlights, brakes, suspension, etc.
TÜV SÜD expert Mr. Volz notes: “The claim that electric vehicles require less maintenance and repairs is not entirely true. Actually, this mainly applies to the transmission, because no fluids or moving parts need to be replaced. But we didn’t expect the Tesla Model 3 to perform so poorly. This reinforces our belief that electric vehicles also require regular maintenance.”
The angry rebuke from Tesla’s defenders was entirely expected: “This is such a lie it’s not even funny… The expert organization either got paid for its conclusion or it didn’t do the research.” Other commentators, however, answered them quite reasonably: “Presenting your own observations in response to statistical research is so incredibly stupid. I have a friend, he has had a Zhiguli for 30 years, and it also does not break down, he only changes the oil and consumables. And another friend has a new Toyota under warranty for the 3rd time in a year. Does this mean LADA is more reliable than Toyota?”
In fact, few would dispute the axiom that research from a reputable tech organization is still more reliable than the emotions of brand fans. However, those willing to foam at the mouth to defend the advantages of electric vehicles over cars with combustion engines are a dime a dozen, although no one has yet put forward irrefutable arguments in favor of ‘green transport’, while its disadvantages are great are. quite clear. And there are two ways we can develop the auto industry.
Either drivers will still be forced to come to terms with the heavily instilled paradigm, or with ‘electric mobility’, along with other post-industrial concepts – such as ‘global warming’, ‘decarbonisation of the economy’, ‘new mobility’, -binary gender identity” – will not withstand the collision with the reality of the emerging new world order.
How the plane that was supposed to fly to the Global Warming Summit in Dubai yesterday could not withstand the collision with reality, but was frozen on the runway of Munich Airport.
Source: Avto Vzglyad
Donald Salinas is an experienced automobile journalist and writer for Div Bracket. He brings his readers the latest news and developments from the world of automobiles, offering a unique and knowledgeable perspective on the latest trends and innovations in the automotive industry.
