April 29, 2025
Auto

Why the Moscow prosecutor’s office treats the arbitrariness of the parking guards in Moscow

  • October 15, 2022
  • 0

The fact that the reasons for the systematic violation of laws by Moscow Parking in terms of the unreasonable opening of enforcement proceedings is banal impunity, a frequent

Why the Moscow prosecutor’s office treats the arbitrariness of the parking guards in Moscow
The fact that the reasons for the systematic violation of laws by Moscow Parking in terms of the unreasonable opening of enforcement proceedings is banal impunity, a frequent topic of discussion in the automotive community. The fact that this is exactly the case and no exaggeration, the journalist of the AvtoVzglyad portal was convinced by her own example.

Cancellation of an illegal fine or litigation for reduction of the fine is generally standard practice that should ideally be worked out by the judiciary over many years of training. But not when you’re dealing with Moscow Parking, a kind of state within a state.

This structure regularly and regularly treats motorists with enforcement proceedings, literally playing the role of creditor – you pay, somehow, but you pay. Despite your fine being appealed in court and by law, no enforcement proceedings and fines can be collected until the end of the trial.

Confident that this practice is really getting underway, an employee of our publication, who appealed the parking fine for insignificance, received from Mosparking first “hello” about the possible opening of an administrative violation and then promptly from the bailiff . about the start of the enforcement procedure, I decided to file a complaint with the public prosecutor about the overbearing officials.

The department’s response is not something that surprised, but put a lot in its place. At the same time, the prosecutor’s office acknowledged that Mosparking was not complying with the law, but saw no reason to impose sanctions on the violator.

“We expected a balanced legal assessment of the fact of an objective violation of the law by both the AMPP GKU and the supervisory and judicial authorities, but unfortunately these hopes proved futile,” lawyer Mikhail Nikitin noted. to the AvtoVzglyad portal. “Mosparking’s offense was only eliminated thanks to our active position. It is completely incomprehensible why the prosecutor’s office has not found a reason to take prosecution measures, despite the fact that the arbitrariness of a certain inspector of the GKU “AMPP” is obvious. But something else became clear. As long as no one is punished for breaking the law, this cruel practice will continue. Well, the question of why no one even tries to hold a particular department accountable remains open…

Photo avtovzglyad.ru

Cancellation of an illegal fine or litigation for reduction of the fine is generally standard practice that should ideally be worked out by the judiciary over many years of training. But not when you’re dealing with Moscow Parking, a kind of state within a state.

This structure regularly and regularly treats motorists with enforcement proceedings, literally playing the role of creditor – you pay, somehow, but you pay. Despite your fine being appealed in court and by law, no enforcement proceedings and fines can be collected until the end of the trial.

Confident that this practice is really getting underway, an employee of our publication, who appealed the parking fine for insignificance, received from Mosparking first “hello” about the possible opening of an administrative violation and then promptly from the bailiff . about the start of the enforcement procedure, I decided to file a complaint with the public prosecutor about the overbearing officials.

The department’s response is not something that surprised, but put a lot in its place. At the same time, the prosecutor’s office acknowledged that Mosparking was not complying with the law, but saw no reason to impose sanctions on the violator.

“We expected a balanced legal assessment of the fact of an objective violation of the law by both the AMPP GKU and the supervisory and judicial authorities, but unfortunately these hopes proved futile,” lawyer Mikhail Nikitin noted. to the AvtoVzglyad portal. “Mosparking’s offense was only eliminated thanks to our active position. It is completely incomprehensible why the prosecutor’s office has not found a reason to take prosecution measures, despite the fact that the arbitrariness of a certain inspector of the GKU “AMPP” is obvious. But something else became clear. As long as no one is punished for breaking the law, this cruel practice will continue. Well, the question of why no one even tries to hold a particular department accountable remains open…

Source: Avto Vzglyad

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *