April 28, 2025
Auto

Eat and don’t choke: the traffic police got a psychological superweapon against the “greyhound” drivers

  • December 8, 2022
  • 0

The Research Center of Road Safety of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, named after V. Ya Kikot,

Eat and don’t choke: the traffic police got a psychological superweapon against the “greyhound” drivers
The Research Center of Road Safety of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, named after V. Ya Kikot, came up with an interesting “manual” for traffic police officers. It describes how to communicate with motorists in controversial situations. Portal “AutoVzglyad” got acquainted with this funny document.

The 50-page work entitled “Improving the Communication Skills of Traffic Police Officers of the State Traffic Inspectorate” begins with complaints about the hardships and difficulties of the inspector’s day-to-day communication with aggressive road users. Who strive to insult the soldier or psychologically manipulate his mind.

In the course of the “game”, several typical conflict situations on the road are considered in the “manual”. Among them: “the driver of the passenger car demands the name of the reason for the stop”, “stopping a truck with an illegible license plate”, “the driver refuses to get out of the car” and several others. Almost everywhere, a police officer is advised to be confident, polite, calm, etc. to avoid conflict with civilians.

The following are specific recommendations for traffic police officers to communicate with drivers. For example, a police officer should “take a position that is comfortable for you and the citizen (the angle between you should be 90 degrees) – this helps to inspire confidence.” And don’t get closer than 18 inches to the driver. A military man must give an agitated and aggressive person the opportunity and time to speak up and calm down, the “manual” broadcasts. Another of her advice to the employee: listen carefully to the citizen and, we quote: “use head nods” – also to create more confidence.

In another part of the manuscript, the traffic cop is instructed to “emphasize the socially accepted qualities and virtues of the driver”. This should be done using simple NLP techniques: phrases such as “You are an attentive and observant person”, “Thanks to your support it was possible …”, “You correctly assessed the situation, so …”, etc.

And if a citizen is aggressive, the policeman is invited to tell him: “Let’s agree on the manifestation of correctness and respect for each other.” Well, what bandyugan won’t melt in front of a cute inspector after such a phrase, right?

All other recommendations follow roughly the same line. And how did the military live until now without this moralizing? But now the theorists of the Research Center for Road Safety of the Ministry of Interior and the Metropolitan University of the Ministry of Interior have fulfilled their sacred duty and brought the “good-eternal” to the broad masses of traffic policemen! Albeit in their virtual representation of how traffic police communicate with motorists in the vastness of Russia.

Meanwhile, ordinary drivers are well aware of the abyss of “psychologism” that the average gay man is capable of, making you stop somewhere on the highway near Chelyabinsk. And how can such a soldier care so much about all this “trust” and “conflict freedom” when he desperately needs your money or a fine protocol. This traffic police fighter will “breakfast” any psychologist from the Moscow office with his recommendations. And don’t choke.

globallookpress.com’s photo

The 50-page work entitled “Improving the Communication Skills of Traffic Police Officers of the State Traffic Inspectorate” begins with complaints about the hardships and difficulties of the inspector’s day-to-day communication with aggressive road users. Who strive to insult the soldier or psychologically manipulate his mind.

In the course of the “game”, several typical conflict situations on the road are considered in the “manual”. Among them: “the driver of the passenger car demands the name of the reason for the stop”, “stopping a truck with an illegible license plate”, “the driver refuses to get out of the car” and several others. Almost everywhere, a police officer is advised to be confident, polite, calm, etc. to avoid conflict with civilians.

The following are specific recommendations for traffic police officers to communicate with drivers. For example, a police officer should “take a position that is comfortable for you and the citizen (the angle between you should be 90 degrees) – this helps to inspire confidence.” And don’t get closer than 18 inches to the driver. A military man must give an agitated and aggressive person the opportunity and time to speak up and calm down, the “manual” broadcasts. Another of her advice to the employee: listen carefully to the citizen and, we quote: “use head nods” – also to create more confidence.

In another part of the manuscript, the traffic cop is instructed to “emphasize the socially accepted qualities and virtues of the driver”. This should be done using simple NLP techniques: phrases such as “You are an attentive and observant person”, “Thanks to your support it was possible …”, “You correctly assessed the situation, so …”, etc.

And if a citizen is aggressive, the policeman is invited to tell him: “Let’s agree on the manifestation of correctness and respect for each other.” Well, what bandyugan won’t melt in front of a cute inspector after such a phrase, right?

All other recommendations follow roughly the same line. And how did the military live until now without this moralizing? But now the theorists of the Research Center for Road Safety of the Ministry of Interior and the Metropolitan University of the Ministry of Interior have fulfilled their sacred duty and brought the “good-eternal” to the broad masses of traffic police officers! Albeit in their virtual representation of how traffic police communicate with motorists in the vastness of Russia.

Meanwhile, ordinary drivers are well aware of the abyss of “psychologism” that the average gay man is capable of, making you stop somewhere on the highway near Chelyabinsk. And how can such a soldier care so much about all this “trust” and “conflict freedom” when he desperately needs your money or a fine protocol. This traffic police fighter will “breakfast” any psychologist from the Moscow office with his recommendations. And don’t choke.

Source: Avto Vzglyad

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *