Pictures with tasks about traffic rules, with which employees of the propaganda departments of the traffic police clumsily try to entertain the audience of their channels on social networks, sometimes frighten them. After all, these “questions” come up with employees of the department, designed to guarantee us safe traffic on the road. And in these fateful tests for knowledge of the rules of the road, military personnel casually show their complete indifference and gouge in the entrusted area of work. As an illustration, here are just five of the many very eloquent “tasks” for drivers posted on the telegram channel of the Sochi traffic police.
“Who is to blame for this situation, the traffic police ask? Blue car, red car or both?
Judging by the photo, whoever came up with and agreed with all the authorities on the road marking plan in this place is primarily to blame for the painted accident. In theory, it should indeed be the case that the red car has no possibility to convert to the right along the indicated route. And for the blue one, in a good way, it was necessary to draw something like an acceleration strip here…
“Markup gives you an advantage? Does it inform you of a left turn or warn you that you are approaching a narrow?”
The correct answer is as follows: only a saboteur-saboteur, wishing death to all motorists, can organize the merging of two lanes into one right on a poorly visible exit. And in winter, when because of the snow it can be completely incomprehensible where the oncoming roadway is and where it is not, this turn certainly deserves the nickname “deadly”.
“The sign indicates the direction of traffic at the intersection? Prohibits turning or warns of two-lane traffic on an intersecting road?
Just mesmerizingly appropriate use of the word “intersected” in the question! He tells us that, according to the questioning traffic officer, any normal motorist could easily cross in such a situation… a fence that is right on the track. Therefore, we will answer in the same vein: this sign says that ahead is the fence of a private house. And the owners of the site are already tired of repairing it every time after the next “Schumacher” or a drunkard at the wheel here “crosses” the road directly to their yard.
“From what lane does an unknown employee of the propaganda department of the traffic police ask the drivers, is it possible to enter a roundabout from here?”
Good question! Especially when you consider that the respondent’s car drives with a brutal violation of the marking requirements – between the wheels. But who cares which lane we turn from if we basically don’t care about the markings?
“Can we turn here like this?” the traffic police ask us.
And we have a counter question: what kind of idiot made the markup like that?! Perhaps the “drawers” of the markings were drunk and missed the intersection when they put a dotted line on the centerline? Or has someone smart in uniform specially organized a U-turn spot in such a way – to increase the chances of “saw” into a turning car, both to oncoming traffic in front of it and to those crossing the secondary road? leave?
Or it’s just a “road trap” specially organized by traffic cops: to provoke drivers turning onto a secondary road, if not to get into the oncoming lane (as in the photo), then at least to get into a to remove a fixed axial. After all, the protocols don’t stink, as you know.
Pictures with tasks about traffic rules, with which employees of the propaganda departments of the traffic police clumsily try to entertain the audience of their channels on social networks, sometimes frighten them. After all, these “questions” come up with employees of the department, designed to guarantee us safe traffic on the road. And in these fateful tests for knowledge of the rules of the road, military personnel casually show their complete indifference and gouge in the entrusted area of work. As an illustration, here are just five of the many very eloquent “tasks” for drivers posted on the telegram channel of the Sochi traffic police.
“Who is to blame for this situation, the traffic police ask? Blue car, red car or both?
Judging by the photo, whoever came up with and agreed with all the authorities on the road marking plan in this place is primarily to blame for the painted accident. In theory, it should indeed be the case that the red car has no possibility to rebuild along the indicated trajectory to the right. And for the blue one, in a good way, it was necessary to draw something like an acceleration strip here…
“Markup gives you an advantage? Does it inform you of a left turn or warn you that you are approaching a narrow?”
The correct answer is as follows: only a saboteur saboteur, wishing the death of all motorists, can organize the merging of two lanes into one on the right on a poorly visible exit. And in winter, when due to the snow it can be completely incomprehensible where the oncoming lane is and where it is not, this turn certainly deserves the nickname “deadly”.
“The sign indicates the direction of traffic at the intersection? Prohibits turning or warns of two-lane traffic on an intersecting road?
Just mesmerizingly appropriate use of the word “intersected” in the question! He tells us that, according to the questioning traffic officer, any normal motorist could easily cross in such a situation… a fence that is right on the track. Therefore, we will answer in the same vein: this sign says that ahead is the fence of a private house. And the owners of the site are already tired of repairing it every time after the next “Schumacher” or a drunkard at the wheel here “crosses” the road directly to their yard.
“From what lane does an unknown employee of the propaganda department of the traffic police ask the drivers, is it possible to enter a roundabout from here?”
Good question! Especially when you consider that the respondent’s car drives with a brutal violation of the marking requirements – between the wheels. But who cares which lane we turn from, if we basically don’t care about the markings?
“Can we turn here like this?” the traffic police ask us.
And we have a counter question: what kind of idiot made the markup like that?! Perhaps the “drawers” of the markings were drunk and missed the intersection when they put a dotted line on the centerline? Or has someone clever in uniform specially organized a U-turn spot in such a way – to increase the chances of “saw” into a turning car, both to oncoming traffic in front of it and to those who cross the secondary road? leave?
Or it’s just a “road trap” specially organized by traffic cops: to provoke drivers turning onto a secondary road, if not to get into the oncoming lane (as in the photo), then at least to get into a to remove a fixed axial. After all, the protocols don’t stink, as you know.
Source: Avto Vzglyad
Donald Salinas is an experienced automobile journalist and writer for Div Bracket. He brings his readers the latest news and developments from the world of automobiles, offering a unique and knowledgeable perspective on the latest trends and innovations in the automotive industry.