The high-profile claim that has recently stirred the entire scientific and technological community was based on a new lead-based material called LK-99. According to the researchers, LK-99 exhibited excellent conductivity at temperatures exceeding 100 degrees Celsius, far exceeding normal superconductivity conditions. Additionally, the material showed levitation over a permanent magnet as a sign of superconductivity.

Scientists do not trust their colleagues

However, the study caused considerable doubt in the scientific community. The bold nature of the claim requires a rigorous level of corroborative evidence that critics say is blatantly lacking.

Reports of a potentially revolutionary discovery sparked a growing chorus of suspicion. Many experts are concerned about the validity of the results, suggesting that the initial exaggeration may be unwarranted.

If the results are confirmed, the LK-99 could usher in a new era of technological advancement. Applications such as airborne vehicles and highly efficient power grids are just a few of the possibilities that will change our lives. Still, it’s getting harder and harder to ignore the strong evidence to the contrary.

uncertain data

One of the most glaring points of disagreement is the presentation of exploratory data. Experts criticize the study for its less than persuasive presentation. As Michael Norman, a theorist at Argonne National Laboratory, points out, the study’s authors seem inexperienced and present the data in a chaotic manner. The general impression is that the scientific rigor expected of such a tremendous breakthrough is lacking.

Nadia Mason, a condensed matter physicist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, offered a balanced view. Although he commended the authors for adequately sharing the data and the methods used to obtain it, he found the presentation of the data somewhat patchy and argued that this could undermine the overall credibility of the findings.

Further complicating the situation is the emergence of reports that articles may have been published. without the appropriate permission of the authors, This points to a lack of confidence in the results.

Verification of results and fake levitation

Meanwhile, the scientific community has seen multiple preprints emerging on platforms like arXiv, all pondering over the LK-99’s viability and its surprising superconductivity claims. Opinions range from those who suggest cooler operating conditions for the material compared to traditional superconductors, to those who are cautious about the potential of the new material.

At the same time, confirmation came from scientists from Guazhong University of Science and Technology, who said they had recently successfully recreated the manufacturing process of the LK-99. At the same time, they showed a video in which the Meissner effect was recorded – the phenomenon of levitation in a magnetic field, which serves as irrefutable proof of the material’s superconducting properties.

It was later revealed that the video was fake. The author confirmed this and deleted the video. However, questions remain about the authenticity of the properties of the LK-99 material, which has stirred the scientific community, so we will have more news about it in the future.