This year by Mona Dian in the magazine Party Politics “Dark” positivity: are candidates with a more aversive personality more likely to use positive campaigns?” An article has been published entitled:.

in Turkish “Dark” positivity: Are candidates with more unattractive personalities more likely to use positive campaigns?” In this article, viz The effect of politicians’ personality traits on whether the campaign is aggressive or positive. is being investigated.

The research approaches this issue from a different perspective. Researcher Dian takes into account that not every politician with a bad personality has to opt for aggressive and aggressive election campaigns. On the contrary, even if they have a bad personality They can run more inclusive and positive election campaigns to mislead. He tries to prove his hypothesis scientifically.

As part of the research, three personality disorders were discussed, the so-called ‘dark triad’.

dark threesome concept; It consists of personality disorders such as narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Before we get into the details of the study, which aims to determine what types of campaigns politicians with these personality disorders prefer, let’s first take a look at what these personality disorders are.

narcissism, It is explained as the admiration someone has for themselves. It is known that people with narcissistic personality disorder are quite selfish and lack empathy.

Machiavellianism, It is a personality disorder characterized by manipulative behavior, exploitation of other people for the Machiavellian person’s own benefit, lack of empathy and morality, and ruthlessness, similar to narcissism.

If it’s psychopathy, Likewise, it is a personality disorder that manifests with symptoms such as a lack of empathy, antisocial behavior and harming other people.

This survey was conducted among 2,133 candidates participating in local elections in Germany.

Of the participants in the survey, 13.4% support the Christian Democrats (CDU), 13.5% the Social Democrats (SPD), 6.7% support the Alternative for Germany (AfD) and 11% support the Alternative for Germany (AfD). 8% belong to the Liberal Party (FDP), 11.1% belong to the Left Party (DIE LINKE), 15.5% belong to the Greens (GRÜNE) and 28.1% belong to other parties. Good politicians of almost every persuasion included in the research.

Participants between 18 and 87 years old 34.6% are women and 65.4% are men.

According to the findings; As the number of people with the mentioned dark triad personality traits increases, so does the tendency to favor positive election campaigns.

People with personality disorders such as narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy, they see themselves as much better than they are is known.

Based on this, the research shows that politicians with dark triad personality traits appeal to voters by running positive election campaigns. It is also possible that they are trying to make themselves look better than they are. It has been said.

It is argued that politicians with these characteristics tend to use both types of election campaigns to the extreme.

One of the common traits of people with dark personality traits is that they for their own interests and benefits It is stated that he has committed actions.

Many election campaigners are based on this Politicians also strive to benefit themselves. The researcher stated that this behavior of politicians is based on profit maximization, just like the dark triad personality traits. emphasizes the similarity between them.

Finally, the tendency of politicians with these personality traits to run positive campaigns is not influenced by other traits.

of persons age, gender, party membership, ideologies and radicalism When looking at other characteristics, such as, it is stated that these characteristics have no effect on the ability of politicians with bad characters to run positive election campaigns.

Of course, this study also has some limitations.

Researcher Dian stated that although the survey was anonymous, the data used in this study was obtained directly from the people themselves through the survey. a state of bias He states that he can create it. In other words, even if it is assumed that the majority answers honestly Because the participants completed the survey themselves, in the survey form He may not have responded honestly to each statement.

To achieve a more accurate result, all participants must by an expert After the examination, it is necessary to make a diagnosis regarding personality traits and repeat this analysis on the politicians who were diagnosed. Whether politicians will allow this is of course another matter…

Our other content that may interest you: