a small town in the southwestern United States of North Dakota dinosaur bone fossil had been discovered. It is true that every newly discovered fossil is important in every way for understanding lost times about which we do not know much; but according to the researchers who examined the fossil, what makes this fossil important is: a special reason it might be possible.

Researchers say this bone of the thescelosaur, a herbivorous species, wiped dinosaurs off the face of the earth forever. the day the meteorite hit the earth It can be separated from the rest of the body. In other words, this fossil 66 million years It means it already exists.

Dinosaur leg may be from the last day dinosaurs roamed the earth

The researchers who made the discovery believe that the fossil, with the skin still attached, caused the extinction of the dinosaurs. until the day of the disaster suspect that it belongs. That said, the researchers also found fish that inhaled the debris during the meteorite impact, a fossil turtle pierced by a wooden pole, small mammal remains and nests, the skin of a horned triceratops, a pterosaur embryo in the egg and possibly a piece of the asteroid is done.

Speaking to BBC News, Paul Barrett of the Natural History Museum of London said there was no disease or bite mark on the leg.“So the best idea we have is that it’s pretty much”an animal that dies instantly it is.” expressions used. On the other hand, some experts a shy approach exhibits.

It is said that the fossil needs to be studied in more detail.

Anthony Fiorillo, a research professor at Southern Methodist University, an expert in taponomy, which focuses on how objects become fossils, said about the bone. “well preserved” expressing that the fossilized soft tissue in the bone is intact; He notes that this is also unusual for dinosaur fossils.

However, Fiorillo noted that the story of the research team is quite interesting. ‘missing’ states that it is. In this regard, Fiorillo “A corpse decomposes, so this animal is dead, and this bone, the tissue that holds it in place, deteriorated to the point where some sort of sedimentological event pulled it off the animal and buried it 10 feet from where the rest of the corpse was found. equally valid it could be” expressions used.

Liz Freedman Fowler, an assistant professor of biological and geological sciences at Dickinson State University in North Dakota, supports Fiorillo’s concerns. Fowler said there isn’t much surface texture in the fossil: “There is a small spot that looks like the skin, but the pictures don’t say anything else enough not good.” saves as.

Fowler also notes that it is unusual for such a set of preserved fossils to be found in the same place. “We’ve heard that there might be footprints there. We want to see what that leg looks like on the ground and in relation to the fish fossils there. We’ve only seen the individual pieces, but how they really fit together.” big formal we haven’t seen it” expressions used.