Note that the stupid “arrivals” of drivers to traffic police inspectors in the spirit of “name the reason for the stop”, “first present the documents” and the like have long been ineffective for traffic police officers. And they even act as a trigger: in front of you is a brutal, but legally illiterate cattle, you can completely “escape”. But there are also expressions with which the car owner can quickly unbalance the police officer. And above all without breaking any laws and regulations.
Let’s say you are in a good mood and have some free time. A traffic cop stops you and asks a standard stupid question: “when was the last time you drank alcohol?” Well, what sane person, even when tipsy, admits to drinking?
And for a sober driver, such an attempt at “separation” from the police is usually quite annoying. Therefore, in response to another such “submission”, you can answer with the phrase: “no, I did not drink, but just in case, let’s go through a medical examination – together with you and in a hospital. ” To finally break the pattern for a military man, you can stubbornly demand a joint “purge” for a while, loudly doubt the crystal clear sobriety of the police officer and report your plans to report suspicions by calling 112. Hallways will be juggling for a long time when he starts asking the same question to other drivers.
Another way to “shake up” a soldier is used if he decides to issue a decision against the driver for some traffic violation. If the police officer is already halfway through the form, tell him the sentence, “You know, but I’m actually a special subject!” A special subject is a judge, an employee of the public prosecutor’s office or an official in respect of whom the traffic police officer does not have the right to draw up protocol decisions. Just report to the leadership of this very “special subject” what happened on the way.
Therefore, after hearing this, the police officer immediately realizes that he wrote the decision in vain. And now he will have to draw up completely different papers. Moreover, it is possible that later they will check him themselves: did he do everything right, did he break any point of the instructions and rules. So, as soon as the driver, calling himself a “special subject”, notices that the traffic cop has realized everything, he says the following phrase: “Just kidding! I am not a special subject.” Seeing the look on the police officer’s face right now is priceless!
Well, the third option of trolling a traffic cop is good for boring and know-it-alls in life. It is suitable if communication with a roadside police officer did not end after a standard check of documents, but turned into claims of a law enforcement officer. Here you should save the booklets with traffic rules and the Code of Administrative Offenses in advance. And require the police officer to confirm each of his actions with a reference to a specific paragraph of the Rules or the Code, checking each time slowly and painstakingly according to their texts. After all, the law requires the employee to explain to the driver the essence of the violation and his actions against him.
For particularly advanced drivers, there is an additional “brain removal” option to the police officer. True, here you also need to have the traffic police regulations with you – in paper or electronic form. This department document states “from and to”: how and what an employee should do when communicating with a motorist. It is good if communication takes place in a patrol car in full view of the camera installed there. It is pure pleasure to watch an officer try to follow the letter of every part of the instruction in the Rules of Procedure, as you aloud compare its provisions with his actions.
Note that the stupid “arrivals” of drivers to traffic police inspectors in the spirit of “name the reason for the stop”, “first present the documents” and the like have long been ineffective for traffic police officers. And they even act as a trigger: in front of you is a brutal, but legally illiterate cattle, you can completely “escape”. But there are also expressions with which the car owner can quickly unbalance the police officer. And above all without breaking any laws and regulations.
Let’s say you are in a good mood and have some free time. A traffic cop stops you and asks a standard stupid question: “when was the last time you drank alcohol?” Well, what sane person, even when tipsy, admits to drinking?
And for a sober driver, such an attempt at “separation” from the police is usually quite annoying. Therefore, in response to another such “submission”, you can answer with the phrase: “no, I did not drink, but just in case, let’s go through a medical examination – together with you and in a hospital.” To finally break the pattern for a military man, you can stubbornly demand a joint “purge” for a while, loudly doubt the crystal clear sobriety of the police officer and report your plans to report suspicions by calling 112. Hallways will be juggling for a long time when he starts asking the same question to other drivers.
Another way to “shake up” a soldier is used if he decides to issue a decision against the driver for some traffic violation. If the police officer is already halfway through the form, tell him the sentence, “You know, but I’m actually a special subject!” A special subject is a judge, an employee of the public prosecutor’s office or an official in respect of whom the traffic police officer does not have the right to draw up protocol decisions. Just report to the leadership of this very “special subject” what happened on the way.
Therefore, after hearing this, the police officer immediately realizes that he wrote the decision in vain. And now he will have to draw up completely different papers. Moreover, it is possible that later they will check him themselves: did he do everything right, did he break any point of the instructions and rules. So, as soon as the driver, calling himself a “special subject”, notices that the traffic cop has realized everything, he says the following phrase: “Just kidding! I am not a special subject.” Seeing the look on the police officer’s face right now is priceless!
Well, the third option of trolling a traffic cop is good for boring and know-it-alls in life. It is appropriate if communication with a roadside police officer did not end after a standard check of documents, but turned into claims of a law enforcement officer. Here you should save the booklets with traffic rules and the Code of Administrative Offenses in advance. And require the police officer to confirm each of his actions with a reference to a specific paragraph of the Rules or the Code, checking each time slowly and painstakingly according to their texts. After all, the law requires the employee to explain to the driver the essence of the violation and his actions against him.
For particularly advanced drivers, there is an additional “brain removal” option to the police officer. True, here you also need to have the traffic police regulations with you – in paper or electronic form. This department document states “from and to”: how and what an employee should do when communicating with a motorist. It is good if communication takes place in a patrol car in full view of the camera installed there. It is pure pleasure to watch an officer try to follow the letter of every part of the instruction in the Rules of Procedure, as you aloud compare its provisions with his actions.
Source: Avto Vzglyad
Donald Salinas is an experienced automobile journalist and writer for Div Bracket. He brings his readers the latest news and developments from the world of automobiles, offering a unique and knowledgeable perspective on the latest trends and innovations in the automotive industry.